Copyright

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Amaro Koberle’s avatar
Amaro Koberle, 5 months ago·#1447·· Collapse

Just intuitively, I feel like there's a difference between forcing others not to force you, and forcing others not to copy you. I feel like defending against others using your scarce means towards their ends is just, while defending against others using non-scarce means towards their end is wicked. Since I impose no opportunity cost on someone by copying information, they have no claim on my scarce means as recompense. The copy-ability of information gives us this nice non-zero-sum situation where we can have our cake and eat it too because we don't have to economize on non-scarce things.

1st of 2 versions ·CriticismCriticized2 criticim(s)
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 5 months ago·#1448·· Collapse

Duplicate of #1346.

Criticism of #1447
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal revised 5 months ago·#1450·· Collapse

This duplicate is symptomatic of a larger and common issue of just reverting back to one’s previous arguments when one hasn’t fully processed the counterarguments. Veritula helps you avoid doing that because you can just look up each idea’s ‘truth status’. If it has outstanding criticisms, you don’t invoke it again. You either save it first or work on something else.

2nd of 2 versions
Amaro Koberle’s avatar
Amaro Koberle, 5 months ago·#1455·· Collapse

Superseded by #1454. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #1447