Dennis Hackethal
@dennis-hackethal·Member since June 2024
Badges
Activity
I spoke to soon. Rolling this back for now. Too jittery when scrolling on mobile. Non-trivial to implement. Need to see how other sites do it.
#4023·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day agoWould be nice if the copy button was sticky-top so that it scrolled with the user.
Done as of 43c4ecc.
Dennis Hackethal updated discussion ‘autopair.js’.
The ‘About’ section changed as follows:
Issue tracker for the autopairing + typethrough package at https://github.com/dchacke/autopair.js
Issue tracker for the autopairing + typethrough package.
https://github.com/dchacke/autopair.js
https://www.npmjs.com/package/autopair
#4030·Dennis HackethalOP, about 15 hours agoWhen you wrap selected text, the selection should remain.
A regression (I believe) has broken this feature.
Fixed as of 830711a (1.2.5).
When you wrap selected text, the selection should remain.
A regression (I believe) has broken this feature.
#4027·Dennis HackethalOP revised about 18 hours agoOn mobile, there needs to be more of a padding on the right, inside the code block.
Done as of 609b5c3.
There needs to be more of a padding on the right, inside the code block.
On mobile, there needs to be more of a padding on the right, inside the code block.
#3951·Dennis HackethalOP, 7 days agoDone as of
cc1ab95.Ruby example:
rubydef criticized? ideapending_criticisms(idea).any?enddef pending_criticisms ideacriticisms(idea).filter { |c| pending_criticisms(c).none? }enddef criticisms ideachildren(idea).filter(&:criticism?)endJS example (h/t ChatGPT):
javascriptfunction criticized(idea) {return pendingCriticisms(idea).length > 0;}function pendingCriticisms(idea) {return criticisms(idea).filter(c => pendingCriticisms(c).length === 0);}function criticisms(idea) {return children(idea).filter(c => c.isCriticism);}
There needs to be more of a padding on the right, inside the code block.
The diff view can’t handle the removal/replacement of entire code blocks yet. The removed block looks broken, the new block doesn’t show at all.
The diff view can’t handle the removal/replacement of entire code blocks yet. The removed block looks broken, the new block doesn’t show at all. See activity 3207 in dev.
#3951·Dennis HackethalOP, 7 days agoDone as of
cc1ab95.Ruby example:
rubydef criticized? ideapending_criticisms(idea).any?enddef pending_criticisms ideacriticisms(idea).filter { |c| pending_criticisms(c).none? }enddef criticisms ideachildren(idea).filter(&:criticism?)endJS example (h/t ChatGPT):
javascriptfunction criticized(idea) {return pendingCriticisms(idea).length > 0;}function pendingCriticisms(idea) {return criticisms(idea).filter(c => pendingCriticisms(c).length === 0);}function criticisms(idea) {return children(idea).filter(c => c.isCriticism);}
Would be nice if the copy button was sticky-top so that it scrolled with the user.
#4016·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day agoThere’s an issue with horizontal scroll for overflowing code blocks in the activity feed on mobile. Can’t scroll all the way to the right.
Fixed as of e49cd8d.
Just as nations can have different forms of governance, minds can too.
For example: Most probably have that CEO-sense of self.
Some minds with lots of coercive memes are more like dictatorships.
People with "smaller egos" (less anti-rational memes) are more like libertarian societies.
But people with set preferences for less self are more like communist societies. That's a kind of coerced decentralisation.
Split personalities would be akin to a highly polarised society that switches governance back and forth.
Just as nations can have different forms of governance, minds can too.
For example: Most probably have that CEO-sense of self.
Some minds with one coercive memeplex are more like dictatorships.
People with "smaller egos" (less anti-rational memes) are more like libertarian societies.
But people with set preferences for less self are more like communist societies. That's a kind of coerced decentralisation.
Split personalities would be akin to a highly polarised society that switches governance back and forth.
Dennis Hackethal updated discussion ‘Living a Rational Life in an Irrational Society – Book Club’.
The ‘About’ section changed as follows:
Discussing ‘How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society?’ by Ayn Rand.
https://courses.aynrand.org/works/how-does-one-lead-a-rational-life-in-an-irrational-society/
Ayn Rand says one important part of living rationally in an irrational society is to pronounce judgment.
In short, if someone attacks your values, say something! Especially if silence could be mistaken as sanction of evil.
If you don’t pronounce judgment, both good and evil know they can’t expect anything from you. So by default, silence favors evil and betrays good. There’s no such thing as moral neutrality or ‘grayness’.
To pronounce judgment, you don’t need to be omniscient or infallible. But you do need integrity.
Many people are afraid of being judged. They like to say “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” They hope to get a moral blank check by writing one for others.
But the reality is that people have to make choices. To make choices, they need moral values. So moral neutrality hurts their ability to make choices. It’s also a slippery slope toward evasions. When people are morally ‘gray’, they say things like ‘no one is fully good or fully bad.’ That just helps evil along.
The moral principle people should adopt instead is: “Judge, and be prepared to be judged.”
Judging means “evaluat[ing] a given concrete by reference to an abstract principle or standard.” It’s not easy and you can’t do it automatically through feelings. It requires deliberate, rational thought. It must be well-reasoned and can’t be arbitrary.
Judging does not mean going around offering your opinion unsolicited or saving others. It does mean two things: “(a) that one must know clearly, in full, verbally identified form, one’s own moral evaluation of every person, issue and event with which one deals, and act accordingly; (b) that one must make one’s moral evaluation known to others, when it is rationally appropriate to do so.”
Sometimes you can just say you disagree, other times you may need to state your views more fully. It depends on your interlocutor and on context.
Pronouncing judgment protects the clarity of your thoughts against society’s irrational background.
Ultimately, society is run either by “the man who is willing to assume the responsibility of asserting rational values” or by “the thug who is not troubled by questions of responsibility.”
So speak out when someone attacks your values.
Summary
Ayn Rand says one important part of living rationally in an irrational society is to pronounce judgment.
In short, if someone attacks your values, say something! Especially if silence could be mistaken as sanction of evil.
If you don’t pronounce judgment, both good and evil know they can’t expect anything from you. So by default, silence favors evil and betrays good. There’s no such thing as moral neutrality or ‘grayness’.
To pronounce judgment, you don’t need to be omniscient or infallible. But you do need integrity.
Many people are afraid of being judged. They like to say “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” They hope to get a moral blank check by writing one for others.
But the reality is that people have to make choices. To make choices, they need moral values. So moral neutrality hurts their ability to make choices. It’s also a slippery slope toward evasions. When people are morally ‘gray’, they say things like ‘no one is fully good or fully bad.’ That just helps evil along.
The moral principle people should adopt instead is: “Judge, and be prepared to be judged.”
Judging means “evaluat[ing] a given concrete by reference to an abstract principle or standard.” It’s not easy and you can’t do it automatically through feelings. It requires deliberate, rational thought. It must be well-reasoned and can’t be arbitrary.
Judging does not mean going around offering your opinion unsolicited or saving others. It does mean two things: “(a) that one must know clearly, in full, verbally identified form, one’s own moral evaluation of every person, issue and event with which one deals, and act accordingly; (b) that one must make one’s moral evaluation known to others, when it is rationally appropriate to do so.”
Sometimes you can just say you disagree, other times you may need to state your views more fully. It depends on your interlocutor and on context.
Pronouncing judgment protects the clarity of your thoughts against society’s irrational background.
Ultimately, society is run either by “the man who is willing to assume the responsibility of asserting rational values” or by “the thug who is not troubled by questions of responsibility.”
So speak out when someone attacks your values.
Ayn Rand says one important part of living rationally in an irrational society is to pronounce judgment.
In short, if someone attacks your values, say something! Especially if silence could be mistaken as sanction of evil.
If you don’t pronounce judgment, both good and evil know they can’t expect anything from you. So by default, silence favors evil and betrays good. There’s no such thing as moral neutrality or ‘grayness’.
To pronounce judgment, you don’t need to be omniscient or infallible. But you do need integrity.
Many people are afraid of being judged. They like to say “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” They hope to get a moral blank check by writing one for others.
But the reality is that people have to make choices. To make choices, they need moral values. So moral neutrality hurts their ability to make choices. It’s also a slippery slope toward evasions. When people are morally ‘gray’, they say things like ‘no one is fully good or fully bad.’ That just helps evil along.
The moral principle people should adopt instead is: “Judge, and be prepared to be judged.”
Judging means “evaluat[ing] a given concrete by reference to an abstract principle or standard.” It’s not easy and you can’t do it automatically through feelings. It requires deliberate, rational thought. It must be well-reasoned and can’t be arbitrary.
Judging does not mean going around offering your opinion unsolicited or saving others. It does mean two things: “(a) that one must know clearly, in full, verbally identified form, one’s own moral evaluation of every person, issue and event with which one deals, and act accordingly; (b) that one must make one’s moral evaluation known to others, when it is rationally appropriate to do so.”
Sometimes you can just say you disagree, other times you may need to state your views more fully. It depends on your interlocutor and on context.
Pronouncing judgment protects the clarity of your thoughts against society’s irrational background.
Ultimately, society is run either by “the man who is willing to assume the responsibility of asserting rational values” or by “the thug who is not troubled by questions of responsibility.”
So speak out when someone attacks your values.
#3951·Dennis HackethalOP, 7 days agoDone as of
cc1ab95.Ruby example:
rubydef criticized? ideapending_criticisms(idea).any?enddef pending_criticisms ideacriticisms(idea).filter { |c| pending_criticisms(c).none? }enddef criticisms ideachildren(idea).filter(&:criticism?)endJS example (h/t ChatGPT):
javascriptfunction criticized(idea) {return pendingCriticisms(idea).length > 0;}function pendingCriticisms(idea) {return criticisms(idea).filter(c => pendingCriticisms(c).length === 0);}function criticisms(idea) {return children(idea).filter(c => c.isCriticism);}
There’s an issue with horizontal scroll for overflowing code blocks in the activity feed on mobile. Can’t scroll all the way to the right.
#1867·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months agoThe red ‘Criticized’ label could be a link leading to a filtered version of
ideas#show.
Yeah or see #2628.
#2886·Benjamin Davies, 3 months agoI am currently unable to zoom out to the full width when accessing Veritula on mobile.
Give this another shot. Should be fixed as of 6c7e74b.
For very deeply nested discussions, you may still need to scroll sideways to see some ideas. But you should now be able to zoom out far enough to always fit any idea into the viewport.
#3951·Dennis HackethalOP, 7 days agoDone as of
cc1ab95.Ruby example:
rubydef criticized? ideapending_criticisms(idea).any?enddef pending_criticisms ideacriticisms(idea).filter { |c| pending_criticisms(c).none? }enddef criticisms ideachildren(idea).filter(&:criticism?)endJS example (h/t ChatGPT):
javascriptfunction criticized(idea) {return pendingCriticisms(idea).length > 0;}function pendingCriticisms(idea) {return criticisms(idea).filter(c => pendingCriticisms(c).length === 0);}function criticisms(idea) {return children(idea).filter(c => c.isCriticism);}
There’s a small issue related to previewing changes in code blocks: even when there are no changes yet, if the code overflows horizontally, the scroll shadow is shown through DOM manipulation, which in turn triggers the diffing library into thinking the user made a change.
So then the same code block is shown without any changes, under the ‘Changes’ tab, which is confusing. It should still just say ‘No changes’.
#3951·Dennis HackethalOP, 7 days agoDone as of
cc1ab95.Ruby example:
rubydef criticized? ideapending_criticisms(idea).any?enddef pending_criticisms ideacriticisms(idea).filter { |c| pending_criticisms(c).none? }enddef criticisms ideachildren(idea).filter(&:criticism?)endJS example (h/t ChatGPT):
javascriptfunction criticized(idea) {return pendingCriticisms(idea).length > 0;}function pendingCriticisms(idea) {return criticisms(idea).filter(c => pendingCriticisms(c).length === 0);}function criticisms(idea) {return children(idea).filter(c => c.isCriticism);}
The diff view can’t handle the removal/replacement of entire code blocks yet. The removed block looks broken, the new block doesn’t show at all.
#3986·Benjamin Davies, 2 days agoBounties should be clear about what currency they are being paid out in.
Valid. As of 7af3c7b, the site uses ‘USD’ throughout.