Search

Ideas that are…

Search Ideas

A quale can be recorded and replayed later, arbitrarily many times.

How do you know this?

#5040​·​Dennis Hackethal, 2 days ago​·​Criticism

A quale can be recorded and replayed later, arbitrarily many times. That looping program is not a person: it can only create whatever knowledge it originally did, not any possible knowledge, maybe until freed from the loop. Yet it still constitutes experience.
So people are not the only programs that can be qualia.

#5038​·​Tyler MillsOP revised 5 days ago​·​Original #5031​·​CriticismCriticized1

True that a person need not create new knowledge, but a looping quale is not a person, per #5035, so the claim survives this criticism.

#5037​·​Tyler MillsOP, 5 days ago​·​Criticism

True, knowledge could be created from each run of a quale, but a looping quale isn't a person, per #5035, so the claim in #5031 that not only people can undergo experience still stands.

#5036​·​Tyler MillsOP, 5 days ago​·​Criticism

Should clarify that personhood is: can create any new knowledge in principle (excluding resource constraints). A program consisting of a looping quale cannot create any possible knowledge, whether or not it is creating some each time it's run.

#5035​·​Tyler MillsOP, 5 days ago

A looping quale is also not a person because personhood is not just: can create a given piece of new knowledge, it is: can create any knowledge (not just that created by this quale; again assuming knowledge creation defines qualia).

#5034​·​Tyler MillsOP, 5 days ago

If qualia are only present when new knowledge is being made, then for a quale to be replayed it could be that there must be a reset each time: the knowledge produced from the previous run is erased. So w.r.t. the AGI system alone, new knowledge is being created each time (it doesn't matter if the knowledge is copied from a previous run and stored elsewhere, in which case it is not new w.r.t. that combined system).

#5033​·​Tyler MillsOP, 5 days ago​·​CriticismCriticized1

Actually maybe this isn't so obvious. A person need not create new knowledge for the personhood property to be present, since it is a counterfactual property: a person can create new knowledge (new and non-inferable, I argue).

#5032​·​Tyler MillsOP, 5 days ago​·​CriticismCriticized1

A quale can be recorded and replayed later, arbitrarily many times. That looping program is not a person (no knowledge is created, however many times it loops, for instance), but it still constitutes experience.
So people are not the only programs that can be qualia.

#5031​·​Tyler MillsOP, 5 days ago​·​CriticismCriticized1

Some people are lactose intolerant, others are vegan.

#5029​·​Dennis Hackethal revised 8 days ago​·​Original #5025​·​Criticism

I’m pro abortion but I have some pro life in me.

Banning the abortion of a zygote seems ridiculous. So does aborting a seven-month-old fetus.

Why not go with: you can abort until the nervous system develops.

Clearly, an embryo without a nervous system can’t be sentient and thus can’t be a person, right? And as long as it’s not a person, it doesn’t have any rights.

According to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542179/, “CNS [central-nervous-system] development begins during the 3rd week of embryogenesis…”

This idea is for viable pregnancies only. Other considerations may apply for non-viable ones.

#5028​·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 8 days ago​·​Original #104​·​ Battle-tested

Link is dead.

#5027​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 8 days ago​·​Criticism

You can just eat fiber with your meals instead, that will slow down insulin secretion afaik.

#5026​·​Dennis Hackethal, 9 days ago​·​Criticism

Some people are lactose intolerant.

#5025​·​Dennis Hackethal, 9 days ago​·​CriticismCriticized1

One is that it's a way of reducing body fat, and overweight is likely a bigger problem for many people than potential short term negatives of fasting.

#5023​·​Dennis Hackethal revised 9 days ago​·​Original #5015​·​Criticism

When a question is a criticisms, you want to mark your answer as a criticism too so it counts as answered.

#5022​·​Dennis Hackethal, 9 days ago​·​Criticism

I tried to look for good arguments against eating dairy for it being dairy and I cannot find any.

#5021​·​Dirk Meulenbelt, 9 days ago​·​Criticized1

Protein above 0.8 g/kg of lean mass is desirable, often up to around 2 g/kg.

#5019​·​Dirk Meulenbelt revised 9 days ago​·​Original #4995​·​Criticized1

There are hints that your body cleans up cells when you fast (autophagy).

#5018​·​Dirk Meulenbelt, 9 days ago

Less constant feeding can improve blood sugar swings and insulin sensitivity because every time you eat, your body has to run the insulin system again.

#5017​·​Dirk Meulenbelt, 9 days ago​·​Criticized1

Eating dinner earlier can be beneficial to sleep because digestion raises body activity.

#5016​·​Dirk Meulenbelt, 9 days ago

One is that it's a way of reducing body fat, and overweight is likely a bigger problem for many people than potential short term negatives of fasting.

#5015​·​Dirk Meulenbelt, 9 days ago​·​Criticized2

Yes. Fat is calorically dense and easy to overconsume, especially from hyper-palatable foods which are often greasy. I try to eat around 60g of fat per day.

#5013​·​Dennis Hackethal revised 9 days ago​·​Original #5012

Yes. Very easy to overconsume, especially from hyper-palatable foods which are often greasy. I try to eat around 60g of fat per day.

#5012​·​Dennis Hackethal, 9 days ago​·​Criticized1

I could see that. Milk is hydrating. Yogurt is a good source of calcium and protein. Can go with low-fat or fat-free options to reduce calories.

#5010​·​Dennis Hackethal revised 9 days ago​·​Original #5009