Activity Feed

  Dennis Hackethal revised idea #3396.

I can take this opportunity to replace manual markdown with a proper text editor. Then there’s no need for autopaired brackets.

The editor will need to support:

  • Automatic links to ideas like #123
  • Links to @mentions like @dennis-hackethal
  • Safe link formatting
  • Disabling of turbo links
  • Namespaced footnotes
  • Custom blockquote format
  • Protection against XSS

I can take this opportunity to replace manual markdown with a proper text editor. Then there’s no need for autopaired brackets.

The editor will need to support:

  • Automatic links to ideas like #123
  • Links to @mentions like @dennis-hackethal
  • Safe link formatting
  • Disabling of turbo links
  • Namespaced footnotes
  • Custom blockquote format
  • Protection against XSS
  • Retention of formatting when pasting
  Dennis Hackethal commented on idea #3171.

Obsidian autopairs markdown syntax and brackets. I like it a lot and would like Veritula to have something similar!

#3171·Benjamin Davies, 16 days ago

I can take this opportunity to replace manual markdown with a proper text editor. Then there’s no need for autopaired brackets.

The editor will need to support:

  • Automatic links to ideas like #123
  • Links to @mentions like @dennis-hackethal
  • Safe link formatting
  • Disabling of turbo links
  • Namespaced footnotes
  • Custom blockquote format
  • Protection against XSS
  Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #3386.

Trial by jury has been central to English Common Law legal systems “since the memory of man runneth not to the contrary.” So you could say it is simply a matter of tradition.

Source

#3386·Dennis HackethalOP, about 22 hours ago

… it is simply a matter of tradition.

Another answer suggests that “We are following a tradition that came from British law of having trials decided by volunteers…” (emphasis mine).

So while having a jury may be tradition, the force part might not be tradition but relatively new.

  Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #3303.

“If we make it a profession, we'll still have elites judging commoners and commoners unable to get justice.” (Source)

#3303·Dennis HackethalOP, 11 days ago

Making something voluntary doesn’t necessarily make it a profession. I buy sandwiches voluntarily, that doesn’t mean I work in that field.

  Dennis Hackethal commented on idea #3391.

[Force is] cheaper than paying jurors their market rate for their time.

Source

#3391·Dennis HackethalOP, about 22 hours ago

Well, at least this response is an honest confession of one of the (potentially) true motivations behind jury duty…

  Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #3391.

[Force is] cheaper than paying jurors their market rate for their time.

Source

#3391·Dennis HackethalOP, about 22 hours ago

It’s not clear to me that force is cheaper. On the contrary, force causes friction. Dealing with people who don’t want to be there results in additional overhead that may be hidden/not reflected in numbers.

  Dennis Hackethal submitted idea #3391.

[Force is] cheaper than paying jurors their market rate for their time.

Source

  Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #3388.

I think the best justification is legitimacy: people accept a court decision better if it was made by their peers, instead of a government employee. That is important in places where the government is not trusted, or trustworthy.

Source

#3388·Dennis HackethalOP, about 22 hours ago

Force reduces legitimacy because there’s a greater risk of abuse and bias in jury selection.

  Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #3388.

I think the best justification is legitimacy: people accept a court decision better if it was made by their peers, instead of a government employee. That is important in places where the government is not trusted, or trustworthy.

Source

#3388·Dennis HackethalOP, about 22 hours ago

Voluntary choice makes the process more legitimate, not less.

The same issue comes up with conscription, say: there’s honor in defending your country voluntarily, if you decide it deserves defending. But if you’re forced to defend it regardless, your efforts aren’t a reflection of merit or legitimacy anymore.

Take the POV of a third party from another country. Let’s say you’re European and you observe, from afar, the US being attacked by a foreign adversary. You also observe millions of Americans signing up the next day to defend America. That would mean something. Europeans could note this development as proof that America has values that are worth defending. But if Americans were instead conscripted, this signal would be lost.

  Dennis Hackethal submitted idea #3388.

I think the best justification is legitimacy: people accept a court decision better if it was made by their peers, instead of a government employee. That is important in places where the government is not trusted, or trustworthy.

Source

  Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #3386.

Trial by jury has been central to English Common Law legal systems “since the memory of man runneth not to the contrary.” So you could say it is simply a matter of tradition.

Source

#3386·Dennis HackethalOP, about 22 hours ago

Making juries voluntary doesn’t mean getting rid of them.

  Dennis Hackethal submitted idea #3386.

Trial by jury has been central to English Common Law legal systems “since the memory of man runneth not to the contrary.” So you could say it is simply a matter of tradition.

Source

  Dennis Hackethal addressed criticism #3384.

If the legislature approves, doesn’t that mean the force is not arbitrary? Since whatever they decide goes through an objective approval process.

#3384·Dennis HackethalOP, about 22 hours ago

It’s still arbitrary if it doesn’t address your objections. That’s a violation of consent and thus irrational.

  Dennis Hackethal addressed criticism #3383.

By that logic, the government could arbitrarily force you to do anything the legislature approves of.

#3383·Dennis HackethalOP, about 22 hours ago

If the legislature approves, doesn’t that mean the force is not arbitrary? Since whatever they decide goes through an objective approval process.

  Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #3333.

[Jury duty is] part of your contract with the country.

Source

#3333·Dennis HackethalOP, 11 days ago

By that logic, the government could arbitrarily force you to do anything the legislature approves of.

  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #3331.

The difficulty of finding volunteers alone means that jury duty must be mandatory.

Not necessarily. It might just mean that courts suck at persuading people to be jurors.

The difficulty of finding volunteers alone means that jury duty must be mandatory.

Not necessarily. It might just mean that courts are bad at persuading people to be jurors.

  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #3332.

… if it were voluntary, it wouldn’t be fair for those who did serve.

By that ‘logic’, we never could have abolished slavery. What a stupid argument.

… if it were voluntary, it wouldn’t be fair for those who did serve.

By that ‘logic’, America never could have abolished slavery because freeing the next generation would have been ‘unfair’ to slaves. What a stupid argument.

  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #3329. The revision addresses idea #3376.

Why does John Doe deserve your best effort? He’s a random stranger to you. Why should you care what happens to him? What has he done to deserve your effort and consideration?

This sounds like sacrifice/altruism.

https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/sacrifice.html
https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/altruism.html

Why does John Doe deserve your best effort? He’s a random stranger to you. Why should you care what happens to him? What has he done to deserve your effort and consideration?

This stance sounds like sacrifice/altruism.

https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/sacrifice.html
https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/altruism.html

  Dennis Hackethal addressed criticism #3329.

Why does John Doe deserve your best effort? He’s a random stranger to you. Why should you care what happens to him? What has he done to deserve your effort and consideration?

This sounds like sacrifice/altruism.

https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/sacrifice.html
https://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/altruism.html

#3329·Dennis HackethalOP, 11 days ago

This sounds like sacrifice/altruism.

Shouldn’t use ‘this’ in isolation. Use a noun with it.

  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #3314.

You want people who don’t care. You need neutrality.

You actually want people who don’t care. You need neutrality.

  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #3271.

Escape special characters


I’ve asked Gemini to explain it:

1. Auto-Closure (Insertion State)

When the user inputs an opening delimiter, the system immediately injects the corresponding closing delimiter and places the caret (cursor) between them.

Input: (

Buffer State: (|)

Logic: insert(openingchar) + insert(closingchar) + move_caret(-1)

2. Type-Through (Escape State)

If the caret is positioned immediately before a closing delimiter that was autopaired, and the user types that specific closing delimiter, the system suppresses the character insertion and instead advances the caret.

Context: [text|]

Input: ]

Buffer State: [text]| (Not [text]])

Logic: if (nextchar == inputchar) { movecaret(+1); preventdefault(); }

3. Atomic Deletion (Regression State)

If the caret is between an empty pair of delimiters, a backspace event deletes both the opening and closing characters simultaneously, returning the buffer to the pre-insertion state.

Context: (|)

Input: Backspace

Buffer State: |

Logic: if (prevchar == open && nextchar == close) { delete_range(caret-1, caret+1); }

4. Selection Wrapping (Transformation State)

If a text range is selected (highlighted) and an opening delimiter is typed, the system wraps the selection rather than replacing it.

Context: |selected_text|

Input: [[

Buffer State: [[selected_text]]

Logic: surroundselection(inputpair)

5. Markdown-Specific Heuristics

Obsidian applies context-aware logic for Markdown syntax (e.g., * or _). It often checks word boundaries to determine if the user intends to bold/italicize or use a bullet point.

Context (Start of line): | + * + Space -> Bullet list (autopair disabled/consumed by formatting).

Context (Middle of line): word | + * -> word | (autopair enabled for italics).

I’ve asked Gemini to explain it:

1. Auto-Closure (Insertion State)

When the user inputs an opening delimiter, the system immediately injects the corresponding closing delimiter and places the caret (cursor) between them.

Input: (

Buffer State: (|)

Logic: insert(opening_char) + insert(closing_char) + move_caret(-1)

2. Type-Through (Escape State)

If the caret is positioned immediately before a closing delimiter that was autopaired, and the user types that specific closing delimiter, the system suppresses the character insertion and instead advances the caret.

Context: [text|]

Input: ]

Buffer State: [text]| (Not [text]])

Logic: if (next_char == input_char) { move_caret(+1); prevent_default(); }

3. Atomic Deletion (Regression State)

If the caret is between an empty pair of delimiters, a backspace event deletes both the opening and closing characters simultaneously, returning the buffer to the pre-insertion state.

Context: (|)

Input: Backspace

Buffer State: |

Logic: if (prev_char == open && next_char == close) { delete_range(caret-1, caret+1); }

4. Selection Wrapping (Transformation State)

If a text range is selected (highlighted) and an opening delimiter is typed, the system wraps the selection rather than replacing it.

Context: |selected_text|

Input: [[

Buffer State: [[selected_text]]

Logic: surround_selection(input_pair)

5. Markdown-Specific Heuristics

Obsidian applies context-aware logic for Markdown syntax (e.g., * or _). It often checks word boundaries to determine if the user intends to bold/italicize or use a bullet point.

Context (Start of line): | + * + Space -> Bullet list (autopair disabled/consumed by formatting).

Context (Middle of line): word | + * -> word *|* (autopair enabled for italics).

  Dennis Hackethal archived idea #3182 along with any revisions.
  Dennis Hackethal restored idea #1833 from the archive, along with any revisions.
  Dennis Hackethal restored idea #2117 from the archive, along with any revisions.
  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #3369.

As of c08f508, the footer automatically hides and shows based on scrolling behavior.

Try it out and let me know if this doesn’t help.

As of 9087189, the footer automatically hides and shows based on scrolling behavior.

Try it out and let me know if this doesn’t help.