> joy may signal a resolved problem↵
↵
But then the conflict is gone. So I don’t think revision #1741 addresses #1730.

> joy[J]oy may signal a resolved problem↵
↵
Butproblem […]↵
↵
But then the conflict is gone. So I don’t think revision #1741 addresses #1730.#1730.↵
↵
To be clear, when I asked about the conflict behind joy, I meant *ongoing* conflict.↵
↵
Your addition seems to agree with my criticism, not address it.