CR terms

Showing only #2826 and its comments.

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, 12 days ago·#2826
1st of 2 versions

Fallibilism

This is the philosophical position that all human knowledge—every belief, theory, and observation—is conjectural, incomplete, and potentially mistaken. It holds that there is no conclusive justification and no rational certainty for any belief. Fallibilism is distinct from skepticism. Skepticism argues that because certainty is impossible, knowledge is impossible. Fallibilism agrees that certainty is impossible but denies that this invalidates knowledge. Fallibilism holds that people can and do possess real, objective knowledge, and that people can improve it through a process of error correction.

Criticized3
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 2 days ago·#3034

[Fallibilism] is the philosophical position that all human knowledge … is … incomplete …

That doesn’t sound right. Potentially incomplete maybe. But you can reach perfection in some fields. You just can’t know with certainty that you’ve reached it.

https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/don-t-take-fallibilism-too-far

Criticism of #2826
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 2 days ago·#3035

It holds that there is no conclusive justification and no rational certainty for any belief.

First you speak of “every belief, theory, and observation”, then you speak only of belief. Some people may accidentally conclude that there can be rational certainty for theories and observations, just not for beliefs.

Criticism of #2826
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 4 hours ago·#3085

Superseded by #3084. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #2826