Hiccdown Development Notes
Showing only #330 and its comments.
See full discussionLog in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Hiccdown methods should live in their own, separate classes. How about they are called ‘displays’?
ruby
class ProductsDisplaydef index vc, # …vc.some_helper_methodendend
Behind the scenes, the Hiccdown gem would need to make the instance variables available to the display class:
ruby
display = @display_module.newview_context.instance_variables.each do |iv|display.instance_variable_set(iv,view_context.instance_variable_get(iv))end
Then:
ruby
class ProductsDisplaydef index vc, # …vc.some_helper_method(@products)endend
Criticized2Archived
Then how would you call index from a helper method?
Criticism of #330Criticized1
I don’t think that’s something people would do a lot, but they still easily could: ProductsRenderer.index(self)
Criticism of #317
I’m trying this now. Having to prepend every invocation of a helper method with vc. is getting really old really fast.
Criticism of #330