Revisions of #4691

Contributors: Tyler Mills

By this standard, a random number generator has universal creativity as well, and is therefore a person. So there must be standard for personhood other than: able to generate any possible explanation. Such as: can do that tractably.

Version 1​·​#4691​·​Tyler Mills​·​21 days ago​·​Criticism
1 comment: #4693

By this standard, a random number generator has universal creativity as well, and is therefore a person. So there must be standard for personhood other than: able to generate any possible explanation. Such as: can do that tractably.

By this standard, a random number generator has universal creativity as well, and is therefore a person. So there must be a standard for personhood other than: able to generate any possible explanation. Such as: can do that tractably.

Unmarked as criticism
Version 2​·​#4692​·​Tyler Mills​·​21 days ago

By this standard, a random number generator has universal creativity as well, and is therefore a person. So there must be a standard for personhood other than: able to generate any possible explanation. Such as: can do that tractably.

By this standard, a random number generator has universal creativity as well, and is therefore a person. So there must be a standard for personhood other than: able to generate any possible explanation. Such as: can do that tractably.

Marked as criticism
Version 3​·​#4694​·​Tyler Mills​·​21 days ago​·​Criticism
8 comments: #4695, #4774, #4777, #4781, #4809, #4856, #4858, and #4860