Revisions of #522

Contributors: Dennis Hackethal

I don’t see why nonexistence cannot also be a logical possibility.↵
↵
If nonexistence is logically possible, and existence is logically possible, we need to explain why the former has been physicalized in the first place.↵
↵
(Logan Chipkin)

I don’t see why nonexistence cannot also be a logical possibility.

If nonexistence is logically possible, and existence is logically possible, we need to explain why the former has been physicalized in the first place.

(Logan Chipkin)

Version 1 · #522 · Dennis Hackethal · 3 months ago · Criticism
2 comments: #523, #526

↓

I don’t see why nonexistence cannot also be a logical possibility.

If nonexistence is logically possible, and existence is logically possible, we need to explain why the formerlatter has been physicalized in the first place.

(Logan Chipkin)

I don’t see why nonexistence cannot also be a logical possibility.If nonexistence is logically possible, and existence is logically possible, we need to explain why the latter has been physicalized in the first place.(Logan Chipkin)

Version 2 · #525 · Dennis Hackethal · 3 months ago · Criticism
2 comments: #527, #546

↓

New revision