Search Ideas

The following commits should address this:

• 3af3966 Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originated idea)
• 6c70cea Underneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submitted it)
• d20d386 Explain that users can revise each others’ ideas
• c5748e3 Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’s idea
• e0fbd41 List user under each revision in version history

Dirk Meulenbelt says the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.

Dirk Meulenbelt the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.

Fixed as of b5d435e.

There’s a bug where right-clicking in a form to paste text doesn’t result in the preview updating.

Done as of cc8e3e9. It now says ‘x unchanged lines collapsed’. See eg this activity.

Done as of a02e6c4, see eg this activity.

Would be neat linking to a specific activity.

Done as of cc8e3e9. It now says ‘x unchanged lines collapsed’.

Diffs should omit unchanged lines. Maybe just leave up to three lines around changed content for context – that’s how git does it.

Now that there are user profiles (#408), each profile can have a tab for unproblematic ideas. Among all the ideas a user has submitted, those are the ones he can rationally hold. And another tab for problematic ideas, ie ideas he has submitted that he cannot rationally hold.

Now that there are user profiles (#408), each profile can have a tab for unproblematic ideas. Among all the ideas a user has submitted, those are the ones he can rationally hold. And another tab for problematic ideas, ie ideas he cannot rationally hold.

There’s a bug where hovering over a link in the markdown preview removes the form and all typed text. Hovering over a link should have no effect on the form.

Done as of 8d3eed0, see eg the version history of #414.

Since the diff processes the text as a single line, the hunk header is always going to say either @@ -0,0 +1 @@ (for the first version) or @@ -1 +1 @@ (for every subsequent version). Meaning the header provides no real information. So I might as well remove it.

Since the diff processes the text as a single line, the diff information is always going to say either @@ -0,0 +1 @@ (for the first version) or @@ -1 +1 @@ (for every subsequent version). Meaning it provides no real information. So I might as well remove that part.

Done as of b3c06c4, see eg my profile.

There should be user profiles.

Done as of e3f2c5b.

In activity feed, behind timestamp (‘… hours ago’), link to corresponding discussion.

Done as of c11a13c.

As of 9702c05, a revision activity now says that the idea was either marked or unmarked as a criticism.

Done as of 735c3cc.

When a comment is a criticism on another criticism, the activity should say ‘So and so addressed criticism #…’

The activity feed just shows top-level criticisms as regular ideas. They should be shown as criticisms just like when they are child ideas.