Search

Words match in any order. "many worlds" matches the phrase exactly; -gravity excludes ideas with “gravity”.

Ideas that are…

Search Ideas


983 ideas match your query.:

Isn't every theory infinitely underspecified ?

No.

#3550·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticism

Bounties are epistemologically relevant.

Let’s say you post a high bounty for some idea and your terms are reasonable. If there are no pending criticisms when the bounty ends, maybe that’s because it’s a good idea.

Scientists, philosophers, anyone who’s serious about ideas, should run bounties.

#3525·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago·​1 pending criticism

[P]eople with set preferences for less self are more like communist societies. That's a kind of coerced decentralisation.

Aren’t communist societies totalitarian and highly centralized?

#3522·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticism

How Do Bounties Work?

Bounties let you invite criticism and reward high-quality contributions with real money.

Starting December 23, 2025, select users can run bounties. Anyone can participate.

Bounties are in beta. Expect things to break.

How do I participate?

First, log in or sign up.

Next, browse the list of bounties. Click a bounty’s dollar amount to view its page, review the bountied idea and the terms, and submit a criticism on that idea.

That’s it – you’re in.

How do I get paid?

Each bounty enters a review period roughly five days after it starts (the exact date is shown on the bounty page). The review period lasts 24 hours. During this time, the bounty owner reviews submissions and rejects only those that don’t meet the stated terms.

To be eligible for a payout, all of the following must be true:

  1. Your submission is a direct criticism of the bountied idea.
  2. Your submission has no pending counter-criticisms when the review period begins.
  3. Your submission meets the bounty terms and the site-wide terms.
  4. You have a connected Stripe account in good standing before the review period begins, and it remains connected through the end of the review period.

The bounty owner is never eligible to receive payouts from their own bounty.

Note that counter-criticisms are not constrained by the bounty-specific terms. Only direct criticisms of the bountied idea are.

How much will I get paid?

The bounty amount is prorated among all eligible submissions.

For example, if there are ten eligible criticisms and you contributed two of them, you receive 20% of the bounty.

Fractions of cents are not paid out. Amounts below USD 0.50 are not paid out.

How do I run a bounty?

Click the megaphone button next to an idea (near bookmark, archive, etc.).

Set a bounty amount and write clear terms describing the kinds of criticisms you’re willing to pay for. Then enter your credit card details to authorize the amount plus a 5% bounty fee.

Your card is authorized, not charged, when the bounty starts.

The bounty typically runs for five to seven days, depending on your card’s authorization window. After around five days, a 24-hour review period begins. During this time, review submissions and reject those that don’t meet your terms. Submissions you don’t reject are automatically accepted at the end of the review period and become eligible for payout. Your card is then charged.

If no eligible criticisms are accepted, your card is never charged.

Start a bounty today. Terms apply.

#3518·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 10 months ago·​Original #3517·​1 pending criticism

How Do Bounties Work?

Bounties let you invite criticism and reward high-quality contributions with real money.

Starting December 23, 2025, select users can run bounties. Anyone can participate.

Bounties are in beta. Expect things to break.

How do I participate?

First, log in or sign up.

Next, browse the list of bounties. Click a bounty’s dollar amount to view its page, review the bountied idea and the terms, and submit a criticism on that idea.

That’s it – you’re in.

How do I get paid?

Each bounty enters a review period roughly five days after it starts (the exact date is shown on the bounty page). The review period lasts 24 hours. During this time, the bounty owner reviews submissions and rejects only those that don’t meet the stated terms.

To be eligible for a payout, all of the following must be true:

  1. Your submission is a direct criticism of the bountied idea.
  2. Your submission has no pending criticisms when the review period begins.
  3. Your submission meets the bounty terms and the site-wide terms.
  4. You have a connected Stripe account in good standing before the review period begins, and it remains connected through the end of the review period.

The bounty owner is never eligible to receive payouts from their own bounty.

How much will I get paid?

The bounty amount is prorated among all eligible submissions.

For example, if there are ten eligible criticisms and you contributed two of them, you receive 20% of the bounty.

Fractions of cents are not paid out. Amounts below USD 0.50 are not paid out.

How do I run a bounty?

Click the megaphone button next to an idea (near bookmark, archive, etc.).

Set a bounty amount and write clear terms describing the kinds of criticisms you’re willing to pay for. Then enter your credit card details to authorize the amount plus a 5% bounty fee.

Your card is authorized, not charged, when the bounty starts.

The bounty typically runs for five to seven days, depending on your card’s authorization window. After around five days, a 24-hour review period begins. During this time, review submissions and reject those that don’t meet your terms. Submissions you don’t reject are automatically accepted at the end of the review period and become eligible for payout.

If no eligible criticisms are accepted, your card is never charged.

Start a bounty today. Terms apply.

#3517·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago·​1 pending criticism

If … the mind is a decentralized system, does the mind have something like a price system for its different parts to communicate?

But the mind isn’t a decentralized system. It has a central ‘I’ sitting at the top. So it’s more like a company with a CEO than a fully decentralized system.

#3514·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticism

Let’s say somebody starts a bounty with permissive terms, asking for virtually any kind of criticism. They set a high ceiling, hoping for many submissions. $200, say.

If they only end up getting one or two small criticisms, for typos, say, they won’t like having to pay 100 bucks a pop.

In other words, the few criticisms you end up getting may not be worth the ceiling.

#3504·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

Then it’s less clear to contributors how much money they can expect.

#3498·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

Need to address the risk of people submitting arbitrary counter-criticisms just before the deadline to exclude competing criticisms from the bounty.

The grace period for the initiator unfortunately does not address this risk since he may decide not to review problematic criticisms.

#3494·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago·​Original #3485·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

Need to address the risk of people submitting arbitrary counter-criticisms just before the deadline to exclude criticisms from the bounty.

The grace period for the initiator unfortunately does not address this risk since he may decide not to review problematic criticisms.

#3490·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago·​Original #3485·​Criticism2 pending criticismsArchived

Need to address the risk of the initiator himself being a bad actor who rejects pending criticisms for arbitrary reasons just to avoid paying.

#3486·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago·​Original #3483·​Criticism4 pending criticismsArchived

Need to address the risk of people submitting arbitrary counter-criticisms just before the deadline to exclude criticisms from the bounty.

#3485·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

The grace period prevents abuse from people other than the bounty initiator.
But the initiator himself could be a bad actor who rejects pending criticisms for arbitrary reasons just to avoid paying.

#3483·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism2 pending criticismsArchived

Feature idea: pay people to criticize your idea.

You start a ‘criticism bounty’ of ten bucks, say, per pending criticism received by some deadline.

The amount should be arbitrarily customizable (while covering transaction costs). The user also indicates a ceiling for the maximum amount they are willing to spend.

There could then be a page for bounties at /bounties. And a page listing a user’s bounties at /:username/bounties.

When starting a bounty, the user indicates terms such as what kinds of criticism they want. This way, they avoid having to pay people pointing out typos, say.

Anyone can start a bounty on any idea. There can only be one bounty per idea at a time.

To ensure a criticism is worthy of the bounty, the initiator gets a grace period of 24 hours at the end to review pending criticisms. They may even award a bounty to problematic criticisms, at their discretion. Inaction automatically awards the bounty to all pending criticisms at the end of the grace period. If doing so would exceed the ceiling, more recent criticisms do not get the bounty.

#3481·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago·​Original #2442·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

Feature idea: pay people to criticize your idea.

You submit an idea with a ‘criticism bounty’ of ten bucks per pending criticism received, say.

The amount should be arbitrarily customizable (while covering transaction costs).

There could then be a page for bounties at /bounties. And a page listing a user’s bounties at /:username/bounties.

When starting a bounty, the user indicates terms such as what kinds of criticism they want. This way, they avoid having to pay people pointing out typos, say.

Anyone can start a bounty on any idea. There can only be one bounty per idea at a time.

#3476·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago·​Original #2442·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

The initiator of the bounty could choose a ceiling for the total they are willing to spend. They could additionally specify the amount per pending criticism.

For example, a user would indicate that they are willing to spend a total of $100 at $10 per criticism.

#3472·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago·​Original #3421·​1 pending criticismArchived

Rather than set a fixed amount for each pending criticism (#3421), the ceiling could be divided among all unproblematic criticisms equally.

#3470·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago·​Original #3424·​1 pending criticismArchived

That could result in amounts too small to cover transaction costs.

#3467·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

There could be a grace period. For example, 24 hours after the bounty ends, no new criticisms can be posted on the bountied idea. That way, the bounty initiator have time to review pending criticisms.

#3465·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago·​Original #3459·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

and others

If others can still participate, it’s not really a grace period.

#3462·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

What happens if they neglect to review pending criticisms?

#3460·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism1 pending criticismArchived

There could be a grace period. For example, 24 hours after the bounty ends, no new criticisms can be posted on the bountied idea. That way, the bounty initiator and others have time to review pending criticisms.

#3459·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism2 pending criticismsArchived

What if every criticism on the bountied idea creates a separate authorization? The bounty initiator would add their card on file and then every time someone submits a criticism, the card is authorized for the per-criticism amount.

#3456·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago·​Criticism2 pending criticismsArchived