Search

Ideas that are…

Search Ideas


1637 ideas match your query.:

Dennis Hackenthal weighs the relative merits of “patches” versus “purges,” meaning incremental political reforms versus revolutions. Hackenthal asks Rat Festers which they prefer. More hands go up for incremental reform. Popper was an incrementalist, and, well, revolutions can get messy.

I don’t recall asking. The central thesis of my talk was that Popper’s advocacy of gradual improvement doesn’t work in certain fundamental matters, ie matters which allow no room for compromise because even the slightest deviation from the ideal means utter surrender of the underlying principle. https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/reason-by-purge-or-by-patch

Oh and it’s Hackethal btw :) No ‘n’.

#2046​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

Lulie Tanett, wearing a “Beginning of Infinity” t-shirt, suggests you can use reason to pinpoint and overcome hidden, irrational fears. So… critical rationalism can help you be your own psychotherapist?

Did she refer to reason? My impression lately is that she repurposes Deutsch’s distinction between explicit thought on the one hand and inexplicit/unconscious (“hidden”) thought on the other to repackage and rebrand Kant’s marriage of reason and unreason.

#2045​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

Over three days Rat Festers give more than 30 talks, most just 15 minutes long, on [several topics including] objectivism (Ayn Rand’s schtick)…

My macOS Dictionary app says for schtick: “a gimmick, comic routine, style of performance, etc. associated with a particular person…”

Calling Objectivism, a serious philosophy developed over decades that has influenced millions to live a life guided by reason, a “schtick”, as if Rand had never had any serious intentions with it, is dismissive and insulting.

But if Horgan has any legitimate criticisms of Objectivism, I want to know. (I have some, too!)

#2044​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

Fixed as of v3.

#2029​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

See #1421 and the surrounding ideas. #2021 is basically a duplicate of #1421, which (at the time of writing, at least), is a duplicate of #1346.

#2027​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

Duplicate of #1421.

#2026​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

The latter is still zero-sum because the author gets nothing in exchange for the work they put in upfront, but expected to get something, and made the distribution of their work contingent upon this expectation being fulfilled.

#2025​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

The important thing is to be able to make predictions about images on the astronomers’ photographic plates, frequencies of spectral lines, and so on, and it simply doesn’t matter whether we ascribe these predictions to the physical effects of gravitational fields on the motion of planets and photons [as in pre-Einsteinian physics] or to a curvature of space and time.

Steven Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (p. 147), John Wiley, 1972. As quoted in chapter 1.

I’m getting conflicting results online for this quote. Some sources that quote the same passage say singular ‘effect’, others use the plural like Deutsch does.

I don’t have access to the original text, so I can’t say for sure if this is possibly a slight misquote or if different people are just quoting different editions.

#2014​·​Dennis Hackethal revised 10 months ago​·​Original #2011​·​Criticism

How will people know what n / m means?

#2005​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

See #1992: “The instructions at the top of the page are clear that not all ideas are being rendered.”

#1997​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

For all ideas, the total number of pending criticisms (if any) should always be shown, even if they are not all being rendered.

#1993​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Archived

The instructions at the top of the page are clear that not all ideas are being rendered.

#1992​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Hiccdown should have support for ids and class names in the tag symbol. Like Hiccup.

ruby
[:'div#my-id.my-class.another-class']
# => <div id="my-id" class="my-class another-class"></div>

It should also allow mixing:

ruby
[:'div#my-id.my-class.another-class', {id: 'override', class: 'additive'}]
# => <div id="override" class="my-class another-class additive"></div>

In other words, the id from the hash would override the id from the symbol, and the class from the hash would be added to the classes from the symbol.

#1984​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

Thanks!

#1977​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago

It’s just an example. We’re not actually trying to solve the problem of where you want to live. We’re trying to understand how Veritula works.

Another example is physics. The idea ‘Newtonian physics is the true explanation of gravity’ has pending criticisms. For all we know, it’s false. But the idea ‘As an architect, I use Newtonian physics to make calculations because it’s simpler than general relativity and gives nearly identical results on earth’ may have no pending criticisms. So it’s rational for the architect to go with Newtonian physics.

The architect isn’t moving the problem into the future. Finding the true explanation of gravity was never his problem. He’s picking the best tool for the job, today.

#1976​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago

Welcome to Veritula, Lola.

I generally like complete silence when I think but sometimes I’ll play soft music to change things up.

You make a fair point, so I’ve updated my blog post to reflect that the ideal noise level varies based on people’s preferences.

Basically, choose a noise level that maximizes your ability to think and hear your own thoughts.

#1972​·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 10 months ago​·​Original #1958

The mere idea ‘continue living in city X’ may have pending criticisms. But so might the idea ‘leave X’. Maybe leaving is too expensive right now, or you’d have to find a new job and you like your job more than you want to leave, etc. In which case there could be a third idea: ‘At some point I’d like to leave X, but for right now that’s too expensive and too cumbersome, so staying in X for another year is fine.’ And that idea may not have any pending criticisms.

Does that make sense?

#1970​·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 10 months ago​·​Original #1962

The current city J live in. … But J still live here.

You should really be able to distinguish the letter J from the letter I. They’re not difficult to tell apart.

I’ve previously suggested that you paste your comments into Grammarly before you post them. Remember to do that until you get so good it routinely finds no issues.

If you have a criticism of that suggestion, state it (in a new discussion). Don’t just ignore the suggestion and continue making spelling mistakes.

#1968​·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 10 months ago​·​Original #1963​·​Criticism

Veritula uses a serif font …

Upon reflection, that doesn’t matter. The letters J and I aren’t difficult to tell apart in sans-serif fonts, either.

#1966​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

I don’t think that solves it because one shouldn’t act on a problematic idea either. And falseness can still be the reason an idea is problematic in the first place.

So, please give an example.

#1960​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

Fixed as of 985d05a.

#1957​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Done as of bfe04e2.

#1955​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

When there are two links next to each other, like when it says “Dennis Hackethal revised” in the activity feed, the user needs some way to see that they’re two links and not just one. Underline on hover shows them that.

#1951​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived