Search Ideas
2803 ideas match your query.:
By the way, you don’t need to put disclaimers like “Addition 01-09-2025”. The versioning system records and displays all that information automatically :)
[J]oy may signal a resolved problem […]
But then the conflict is gone. So I don’t think revision #1741 addresses #1730.
To be clear, when I asked about the conflict behind joy, I meant ongoing conflict.
Your addition seems to agree with my criticism, not address it.
Or the existing search page could be filtered by discussion. For example, I could link to that page with an additional query param discussion_id=1 or something like that.
Or each discussion could have a search/filter form to filter ideas not just by criticized or not but also content and potentially other attributes.
Make sure cycling between a leaf revision with children and a leaf revision without children properly toggles the gutter.
Sometimes you just want to hide the comments without collapsing the parent idea.
Because that would mean hiding each comment individually if you ever do want to hide all comments of an idea.
As noted in #1777, fetching the idea actually helps. Well worth the overhead.
This actually helps to prevent rendering links with IDs that don’t point to any existing idea.
Wouldn’t even need friendly ID for that since the URL would contain the ID. Would only need to override to_param to concatenate the idea’s ID and content.
Seems like minor overhead. It’s not like there are tons of user-generated hashtags everywhere.
Reddit is a bit different because they have multiple subreddits/communities, but each community has top-level posts which people can then comment on. They have a completely separate page/UI for top-level posts. And then directly underneath a top-level post, there’s a textarea saying “Join the conversation”.
Could have backwards compatibility for the short version and continue using the hashtag in the UI. Best of both worlds?
The way IG solves this is by rendering the form in a fixed position. It’s still on the bottom but always remains visible.
Sure, philosophers and pedants do. But typically people use the word "know" in situations well short of being absolutely sure.