Activity

  Dirk Meulenbelt commented on idea #2255.

Haha not a programmer so understood maybe half of it, but I think I see what you mean. There'll always be inexplicit parts to every explanation. My concept of explanations is that there must be at least some explicit part for it to be called an explanation. That's why genes aren't explanations.

#2255·Erik Orrje, 2 days ago

My point is rather that it's not so clean a line between explicit and inexplicit. You're a doctor, so imagine the steps being something like:

  1. Extensive description of patient's symptoms, test results, conclusion, etc, in English.
  2. Same as above but mostly made out of quick notes by attending doctors and nurses.
  3. Only a collection of test names and test results. Test results accompanied by Chinese.
  4. Just a collection of numbers coming out of tests, without saying which test.

Arguably all the information is always there, and can be read off, but with increasing difficulty, requiring you to learn another language, or do a series of deductions.