Activity
Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #2409.
#2409·Erik Orrje, 8 days agoThanks. Do you think there's correspondence for abstractions as well (such as mathematics, as DD seems to suggest)? As I understood, you only think we need it to explain progress in science.
…you only think we need it to explain progress in science.
No, I think progress in science is explained by error correction. The aim of science is correspondence. There’s a difference between aims and means.