Activity
#5576·Dennis HackethalOP, about 4 hours agoOne could run the program again with corrected inputs but as I noted in #5533, that approach won’t scale.
Jad originally replied in #5559. I’ve extracted his reply to avoid bulk criticism:
If the user later changes their mind about one of those judgments, then yes, the current minimal CLI requires them to run it again with the corrected input. I agree that wouldn't be good UX for a full application, but that's not what I'm trying to build here. Adding the ability to add, edit, or delete variations and immediately recalculate the ranking is straightforward and doesn't change the decision procedure being demonstrated.
@jadelmourad be sure to submit separate criticisms separately. You benefit because it means I need to address each criticism individually, not in ‘bulk’. (See #5546, keyword ‘bulk’.)