Activity
#5623·Jad Elmourad, about 3 hours agoOne can’t agree to a rule, immediately break it, get an unfair advantage, hope I won’t notice, and then complain when I do.
I don't accept the characterization that I knowingly violated the rule and hoped you wouldn't notice. That wasn't my state of mind. More on this in #5622.
Veritula discussion trees can’t accurately reflect problematic vs unproblematic ideas when unreasonable people are involved, see #5624. Submitting this as a fix. Jad agrees to terms, breaks them, then wants to argue the purpose and meaning of them. That’s arbitrary, ie the opposite of reason and Veritula. He will no doubt claim he was just trying to follow the Veritula method of addressing criticisms, but the effect is that he’s turning Veritula on its head in the process. There’s no point discussing with people like him.