Dennis Hackethal
Member since June 2024
Activity
#717 · Dirk Meulenbelt, 7 months agoI didn't know that. I figured linking to the tweet that posted it would be fine.
Providing the source doesn’t fix the (potential) copyright violation, if that’s what you’re suggesting.
‘Honduran Supreme Court declares zones for employment and economic development (ZEDEs) unconstitutional’
8 unchanged lines collapsed> […] as we now have many more news sources we didn’t yet know about. Don’t explain yourself to your readers. Remove this part.
Not a lawyer but reproducing the entire letter from PrósperaZedeZEDE is presumably a violation of their copyright.
We will update you on news, events, and do longer form write-ups […]
‘longer-form’
[…] on the projects discussed in the talks, […]
You mentioned the talks in the previous sentence. Remove “discussed in the talks” and instead say ‘discussed projects’ or ‘projects that were discussed’.
as we now have many more news sources we didn’t yet know about.
Don’t explain yourself to your readers. Remove this part.
In the coming period, expect us to pick up on many of the talks’ subject matter.
Zu- series of popup projects
That hyphen looks out of place.
The Honduran Supreme Court still needs to publish an explanatory addendum on the passed law to explain how (existing) ZEDEs will be dealt with after this ruling.
Passive voice hides accountability. Who will deal with ZEDEs? Use active voice accordingly.
Prospects for Próspera and other ZEDEs look dire and in a recent post […]
The alliteration threw me off a bit here. And if they’re dire they’re not really prospects. ‘Outlook’ might work better here.
lighter taxes and regulations
‘lower taxes and lighter regulations’ (I don’t think taxes can be ‘light’)
> made […] legallypossiblepossible↵ ↵ Just say ‘legalized’
#698 · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months agoHonduran Supreme Court declares ZEDEs unconstitutional, putting Próspera and other ZEDEs in jeopardy.
Not everyone knows what a “ZEDE” is. Is it an acronym? What does it stand for?
I now see that the newsletter links to an explanation further down:
ZEDEs are SEZs in Honduras.
But that’s too late. May have already lost readers at that point.
Not a lawyer but reproducing the entire letter from Próspera Zede is presumably a violation of their copyright.
One of the people running ‘Based Brief’ has requested criticism, specifically of their latest newsletter titled ‘Honduras rugpulls Próspera and other ZEDEs’. These criticisms aren’t meant to be exhaustive.
Honduran Supreme Court declares ZEDEs unconstitutional, putting Próspera and other ZEDEs in jeopardy.
Not everyone knows what a “ZEDE” is. Is it an acronym? What does it stand for?
> Your subconscious is like a computer […] She says “like” so the sentence is technically correct, but it would have beenmore correctbetter if she had said the subconscious is a program (or an amalgamation of programs). What she’s presumably getting at here is that the subconscious is *automatic* like a computer and unlike the conscious, which can stop and reflect and criticize and so on.
#670 · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months agoYour subconscious is like a computer […]
She says “like” so the sentence is technically correct, but it would have been more correct if she had said the subconscious is a program (or an amalgamation of programs). What she’s presumably getting at here is that the subconscious is automatic like a computer and unlike the conscious, which can stop and reflect and criticize and so on.
more correct
Something is either correct it isn’t. There is no “more” correct.
#641 · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months agoI don’t think it’s “a lot like” doing science – the underlying logic is the same, science being just one particular instance of problem solving. This is then acknowledged in the subsequent sentence:
[...] Popper’s epistemology applies to all problem solving, not just to science.
So why mention science if you’re just going to generalize the restriction away regardless?
I just found this related Popper quote underscoring my point:
Truth is hard to come by. It needs both ingenuity in criticizing old theories, and ingenuity in the imaginative invention of new theories. This is so not only in the sciences, but in all fields.
> Your subconscious is like a computer […] She says “like” so the sentence is technically correct, but it would have beenclearermore correct if she had said the subconscious is a program (or an amalgamation of programs). What she’s presumably getting at here is that the subconscious is *automatic* like a computer and unlike the conscious, which can stop and reflect and criticize and so on.
> Your subconscious is like a computer […] She says “like” so the sentence is technically correct, but it would have been clearer if she had saidit’sthe subconscious is a program (or an amalgamation of programs). What she’s presumably getting at here is that the subconscious is *automatic* like a computer and unlike the conscious, which can stop and reflect and criticize and so on.
Fix separating punctuation
Ayn Rand writes: > % source: AynRand.Rand, *Philosophy: Who NeedsIt.*It*, chapter ‘Philosophy: Who NeedsIt.’↵ >It’↵ > % link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Objectivism/comments/1fnmccf/the_importance_of_conviction/ > Your subconscious is like a computer—more complex a computer than men can build—and its main function is the integration of your ideas. Who programs it? Your conscious mind. If you default, if you don’t reach any firm convictions, your subconscious is programmed by chance—and you deliver yourself into the power of ideas you do not know you have accepted.
#661 · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months agoAyn Rand writes:
Your subconscious is like a computer—more complex a computer than men can build—and its main function is the integration of your ideas. Who programs it? Your conscious mind. If you default, if you don’t reach any firm convictions, your subconscious is programmed by chance—and you deliver yourself into the power of ideas you do not know you have accepted.
[…] your subconscious is programmed by chance […]
This sounds as if chance was the programmer. The word ‘randomly’ might have been better. But that presumably still isn’t quite what she meant; I think she meant something like ‘haphazardly’, with no clear direction, by uncritical integration, ie osmosis, of ideas from the surrounding culture, as I believe she put it elsewhere.
#661 · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months agoAyn Rand writes:
Your subconscious is like a computer—more complex a computer than men can build—and its main function is the integration of your ideas. Who programs it? Your conscious mind. If you default, if you don’t reach any firm convictions, your subconscious is programmed by chance—and you deliver yourself into the power of ideas you do not know you have accepted.
[The] main function [of your subconscious] is the integration of your ideas.
Isn’t it the conscious mind that does the integrating, and then the subconscious stores the integrated ideas and executes them in applicable contexts?