Objectivist Criticisms of Anarcho-Capitalism

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.

[There is a] difference between the functions of government and the functions of industry, between force and production.

Rand says ancaps make the same mistake as “modern statists” – they don’t see this difference.

#10 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago · context · CriticismCriticized1 criticim(s)

Defensive force and security services are productive endeavors.

Retaliatory force is only part thereof, and defense involves the employment of scarce resources, thus economic principles apply. (Logan Chipkin)

If the government tries to step outside the free market, that’s tantamount to pretending there’s magically no scarcity for the government. But in reality, the government still has to attract talent to fill government jobs, pay that talent, and use scarce resources. If it tries this without the error-correction mechanisms the free market provides, it will do anything poorly.

#267 · · Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago · 2nd of 2 versions · Criticism of #10

KodoKB points out a risk of abuse:

The use of retaliatory force has an objective risk of being misapplied and therefore of violating the rights of others.

Related: #4

#12 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago · Criticism of #267Criticized1 criticim(s)

A monopoly on violence amplifies the risk of abuse.

#13 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago · Criticism of #12
#13 · expand
#12 · expand
#267 · expand
#10 · expand