Copyright

Showing only those parts of the discussion which lead to #1372.

See full discussion·See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Amaro Koberle’s avatar
Amaro Koberle, 7 months ago·#1336

To keep someone from copying your work you have to infringe on the private property of that person by claiming an exclusive right on prohibiting his use of his privately owned copying medium to instantiate a certain pattern.

CriticismCriticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 7 months ago·#1339

‘To stop someone from murdering you you have to infringe on his private property by claiming an exclusive right on prohibiting his use of his privately owned gun to shoot you’ How is that different?

Criticism of #1336
Amaro Koberle’s avatar
Amaro Koberle, 7 months ago·#1368

Maybe? Kinda? Not sure.

You don't get to use your knife to aggress on others, that much is clear. So perhaps this can be understood as a right of others to do certain things with your property.

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 7 months ago·#1369

Right, like preventing you from murdering them.

Amaro Koberle’s avatar
Amaro Koberle, 7 months ago·#1370

exactly

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 7 months ago·#1371

So… the law extending to others’ property is nothing new and not totalitarian in and of itself.

Amaro Koberle’s avatar
Amaro Koberle, 7 months ago·#1372

true!