How Does Veritula Work?

Showing only #2118 and its comments.

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 7 days ago·#2118

Decision-Making on Veritula

Expanding on #2112

If an idea has no pending criticisms, it’s rational to adopt it and irrational to reject it. What reason could you have to reject it? If it has no pending criticisms, then either 1) no reasons to reject it have been suggested or 2) all suggested reasons have been addressed already.

If an idea does have pending criticisms, it’s irrational to adopt it and rational to reject it – by reference to those criticisms. What reason could you have to ignore the pending criticisms and adopt it anyway?

Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

What reason could you have to reject [an idea that has no pending criticisms]?

Maybe the idea lacks something I want.

Criticism of #2118Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 5 days ago·#2203

That would be a pending criticism.

Criticism of #2120
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

What reason could you have to ignore the pending criticisms and adopt it anyway?

Maybe the criticisms aren’t very good.

Criticism of #2118Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 5 days ago·#2221

Then you counter-criticize them for whatever you think they lack (which should be easy if they really aren’t good), thus addressing them and restoring the idea.

Criticism of #2122
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, 7 days ago·#2124

If [an idea] has no pending criticisms, then either 1) no reasons to reject it have been suggested …

If no one has even tried to criticize the idea, its adoption seems premature. (This is a modification of Kieren’s view.)

Criticism of #2118Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, 7 days ago·#2125

That would itself be a criticism, but it would lead to an infinite regress: any leaf of the discussion tree would always get one criticism claiming that its advocacy is premature. But then the criticism would become the new leaf and would thus have to be criticized for the same reason, and so would every subsequent criticism, forever and ever.

Criticism of #2124
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 7 days ago·#2138

What reason could you have to ignore the pending criticisms and adopt [the criticized idea] anyway?

Maybe the criticisms aren’t decisive.

Criticism of #2118Criticized3oustanding criticisms
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 7 days ago·#2134

If you don’t have any counter-criticisms, how could the criticisms not be decisive?

Criticism of #2138
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Popper didn’t say to correct some errors while ignoring others for no reason. He spoke of error correction, period.

Criticism of #2138
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, 7 days ago·#2133

This criticism reminds me of a passage in Objective Knowledge, where Popper says some people defend ugly theories by claiming they’re tiny, like people do with ugly babies. Just because (you think) a criticism is tiny doesn’t mean it’s not ugly.

Criticism of #2138
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Superseded by #2140. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #2118