Is correspondence true (in CR)?

Showing only ideas leading to #2323.

See full discussion·​See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.
Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
Erik Orrje’s avatar
Erik OrrjeOP·​#2320·​

CR is an evolutionary theory. There's no need for correspondence in Darwinism. Therefore, we don't need it in CR either.

Criticized1*
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies·​#2321·​·​Criticism
Only version leading to #2323 (2 total)·​latest

I think correspondence is to epistemology as adaptation is to evolution. Knowledge that corresponds more to reality tends to be more useful (and with more reach), similar to biological adaptation.

Criticized1*
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies·​#2323·​·​Criticism·​System-generated

Superseded by #2322.

  • Rationally adoptable.
  • Not rationally adoptable.
  • Older versions with pending criticisms.
  • Ideas are blue, criticisms red, comments small and gray.
  • Hover over ideas to expand them.
  • Click on ideas to jump to their place in the discussion.