Veritula – Meta

Showing only those parts of the discussion which lead to #2659 and its comments.

See full discussion·See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 6 days ago·#2630
Only version leading to #2659 (2 total)

Discussions are getting slower to render as they grow. It’s a rendering issue (not a db issue).

Criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 3 days ago·#2659

I could use ActionController::Live to stream top-level ideas to the page one by one. Instant page load.

Battle tested
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Including that module significantly slows down hot reloads on all pages. I need a tight feedback loop in dev.

Criticism of #2659Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Fast UX is more important than fast developer experience.

Criticism of #2647Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

A slow developer experience will slow down all further development, including bug fixes and feature rollouts, which hurts UX as well.

Criticism of #2648
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

After resetting my working directory and beginning to implement streams a second time, I can no longer reproduce this issue, despite reasonable attempts to reproduce it.

Criticism of #2647Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, 4 days ago·#2651

I’ve since been able to reproduce the issue after all. Running a raw SQL query in Idea.tree in combination with the inclusion of the Live module seems to mess with Rails’s reloader.

Criticism of #2650
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Replacing a raw SQL query in Idea.tree with a standard ActiveRecord query solves this issue.

Criticism of #2647
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

This page used to take ~3.5 seconds to load. Now it renders within 600ms :)

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Incompatible with Devise authentication: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/issues/2332

Criticism of #2659Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 3 days ago·#2688

The thread suggests a workaround: use authenticated do … blocks in routes.rb instead of before_action :authenticate_user! in controllers.

It’s probably a good idea to do this anyway to avoid divulging the existence of routes that unauthenticated users don’t need to know exist. (They will get a 404 instead of a 401.)

Criticism of #2670Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Then again, I’d want to redirect users to the sign-in page (and then ideally back to where they were trying to go).

Criticism of #2688
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

I could extract discussions#show into a new, separate StreamController or something like it. That controller would not use Devise.

Criticism of #2670
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

I could override authenticate_user! in the DiscussionsController.

Criticism of #2670Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

That means duplicate functionality; anytime I customize Devise in the future, I’ll have to remember to adjust this one method as well.

Criticism of #2692
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

JS modules are always deferred and unusable until the page is fully loaded. As a result, comment buttons and gutters won’t work while ideas are still streaming onto the page.

Criticism of #2659Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, 3 days ago·#2694

I now purposely prevent interactions with buttons and gutters, and gray them out, until the page is fully loaded. So instead of broken hover effects and interactions, the user gets intentionally disabled elements, and this intentionality is communicated to them.

Once the page is fully loaded, buttons and gutters are enabled and visually restored.

Since the browser’s loading indicator remains visible until then, this behavior shouldn’t violate user expectation.

Criticism of #2671
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

cmd + f won’t work reliably.

Criticism of #2659Criticized2oustanding criticisms
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Now that parts of the page are purposely and visually disabled (see #2694), users may not expect everything to be working 100% during a loading state.

Criticism of #2679
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, 2 days ago·#2696

This problem will surface rarely – users would have to hit cmd + f immediately upon opening the page. For most users, by the time they start typing, the page is already fully loaded. So this seems like a small price to pay in exchange for discussion pages that always render faster.

Criticism of #2679