Veritula – Meta

Showing only those parts of the discussion which lead to #2757.

See full discussion·See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 days ago·#2701
Only version leading to #2757 (3 total)

Old ideas can pollute discussions. Like in this meta thread.

CriticismCriticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Only version leading to #2757 (2 total)

Proposed solution: ideas could be archived automatically if they haven’t been revised or criticized in 90 days, say.

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

This could inadvertently hide dormant but important ideas.

Criticism of #2704Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, 4 days ago·#2709

Could do it only for ideas with pending criticisms. If they have pending criticisms, how important can they be? This has the added benefit of creating an incentive for proponents of ideas to address criticisms.

Criticism of #2706
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies revised 1 day ago·#2759
Show idea #2741Show idea #27412nd of 2 versions leading to #2757 (3 total)

Would ideas that no longer have pending criticisms (perhaps because the criticism chain has been flipped further down) be pulled out of the archive?

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Yes