Veritula – Meta

Showing only those parts of the discussion which lead to #2780.

See full discussion·See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies revised 2 days ago·#2753
Show idea #2750Show idea #27502nd of 2 versions leading to #2780 (2 total)

Idea: Veritula Articles

Currently, Veritula is a discussion website. I believe it could one day do what Wikipedia and Grokipedia do, but better.

A step towards that would be enabling users to produce ‘articles’ or something similar.

An ‘Articles’ tab would be distinct from the ‘Discussions’ tab, featuring explanatory documents similar to encyclopedia entries, and perhaps also blogpost-like content.

Articles focus on distilling the good ideas created/discovered in the discussions that occur on Veritula.

Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies, 2 days ago·#2751

‘Articles’ are functionally no different than top-level ideas in a discussion thread.

Criticism of #2753Criticized2oustanding criticisms
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies, 2 days ago·#2752

Top-level ideas in a discussion thread are not standalone pages.

One thing that Wikipedia does well is having a structured, high level page for each idea/subject. This enables readers to get a good sense of an idea quickly.

Right now, to get a good sense of an idea on Veritula, a user often has to study a branching discussion, which can take a lot of work depending on how the discussion played out. A discussion also emphasises things that were relevant to the disagreements that took place in the discussion, rather than distilling the most important elements of an idea into a hierarchy, regardless of disagreements that took place in getting to it (like an encyclopedia entry does).

Criticism of #2751
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, about 20 hours ago·#2768

Right now, to get a good sense of an idea on Veritula, a user often has to study a branching discussion, which can take a lot of work depending on how the discussion played out.

While this is true for most existing discussions, it’s not a fundamental limitation of discussions in general. For example, ‘How Does Veritula Work?’ has several long-form posts without much discussion. It just depends on what kinds of posts people want to submit.

Criticism of #2752Criticized1oustanding criticism
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies, about 12 hours ago·#2778
Only version leading to #2780 (2 total)

See #2777.

While it is true that discussions don’t restrict people from posting long-form content that on the ‘How Does Veritula Work?’ discussion, that is not the intuitive function of a discussion thread. I believe the long-form content in that discussion is much more natural to an article format.

Criticism of #2768Criticized1oustanding criticism
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies, about 12 hours ago·#2780

Superseded by #2779. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #2778