CR terms

Showing only #2829 and its comments.

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP revised 9 days ago·#2829
3rd of 4 versions

The Open Society

This is the political philosophy of Critical Rationalism, detailed by Karl Popper in The Open Society and Its Enemies. An open society is one in which each individual is largely enabled to make their own personal decisions, as opposed to a tribal or collectivist society. It replaces the justificationist political question, "Who should rule?", with the fallibilist question: "How can we structure our institutions so that we can remove bad rulers and bad policies without violence?". In this view, democracy is not "rule by the people" (an essentialist definition) but is valued as the only known institutional mechanism for error-correction and leadership change without bloodshed.

Criticized6
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 8 days ago·#2859

Broken links

Criticism of #2829
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 8 days ago·#2866

The Open Society

This is the political philosophy …

I haven’t read that book but it seems weird to call a society a philosophy. You sure that’s what Popper means?

Criticism of #2829
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 8 days ago·#2868

each individual

I see several opportunities for simplification of language in this idea. The quote above is one of them. You could instead say ‘everyone’ or ‘people’.

Criticism of #2829
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 8 days ago·#2869

is largely enabled to

can

Criticism of #2829
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 8 days ago·#2870

their own personal

Double (triple?) tautology

Criticism of #2829
Benjamin Davies’s avatar

Superseded by #2895. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #2829