Attempts at Understanding Fallibilism

Showing only #3138 and its comments.

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Zelalem Mekonnen’s avatar
Zelalem MekonnenOP revised about 7 hours ago·#3138
17th of 19 versions

Fallibilism is the view that there is no criterion to say with certainty what’s true and what’s false. As a result, we inevitably make mistakes and all of our knowledge is tentative in nature. Nothing is obvious but depends on what one understands about reality. It also means that no knowledge is beyond revision, even if it claims to be. Knowledge grows by addressing problems in our knowledge. We solve problems by guessing solutions and testing them. This also means we should always be careful not to destroy or even slow down the things and ideas that correct errors and thereby create knowledge. Some of those ideas are freedom, privacy, and free markets. We are also never the passive recipients of our knowledge; we are the creators.

This view is mainly influenced by Popper, and errors are my own.

Criticized3
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 7 days ago·#3045

Some of those ideas are freedom, privacy, and free markets.

Out of scope for fallibilism.

Criticism of #3138
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 7 days ago·#3046

We are also never the passive recipients of our knowledge; we are the creators.

Out of scope for fallibilism.

Criticism of #3138
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 7 days ago·#3048

Superseded by #3047. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #3138