Is Self-Replication Required for the Growth of Knowledge?

Showing only ideas leading to #4052.

See full discussion·​See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.
Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal·​#4049·​

My neo-Darwinian approach to the mind suggests that minds evolve knowledge through the imperfect replication of ideas.

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal·​#4050·​·​Criticism

Some people (most notably Ella Hoeppner) have argued that replication isn’t necessary for evolution to take place. All you need is variation and selection.

Criticized4*
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal·​#4052·​·​Criticism

2) We can explain more if we use replicators. For example, memory and the origin of creativity just ‘fall out’ of the neo-Darwinian approach. Ideas in a single mind may have static vs dynamic replication strategies. All of that is lost without the notion of replication.

  • Rationally adoptable.
  • Not rationally adoptable.
  • Older versions with pending criticisms.
  • Ideas are blue, criticisms red, comments small and gray.
  • Hover over ideas to expand them.
  • Click on ideas to jump to their place in the discussion.