Is Self-Replication Required for the Growth of Knowledge?

Showing only ideas leading to #4054.

See full discussion·​See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.
Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal·​#4049·​

My neo-Darwinian approach to the mind suggests that minds evolve knowledge through the imperfect replication of ideas.

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal·​#4050·​·​Criticism

Some people (most notably Ella Hoeppner) have argued that replication isn’t necessary for evolution to take place. All you need is variation and selection.

Criticized4*
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal·​#4054·​·​Criticism

As I wrote in #4051, it doesn’t matter to me whether replication is necessary for evolution to take place. I’m open to the idea that it isn’t. But what I’d like instead is some argument why it couldn’t figure in the evolution that happens in the mind.

  • Rationally adoptable.
  • Not rationally adoptable.
  • Older versions with pending criticisms.
  • Ideas are blue, criticisms red, comments small and gray.
  • Hover over ideas to expand them.
  • Click on ideas to jump to their place in the discussion.