NZ Policy Reforms

Showing only those parts of the discussion that lead to #4426.

See full discussion​·​See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You mau need to scroll sideways.
Ben GK’s avatar

Context:
I have been trying to think of a way to escape the current downward spiral that New Zealand is facing. In doing so, what was important to me in formalising it was having a level of precision about what the most maximalist position I agree with would be, which still meets my criteria for implementation. The specifics would be harder to implement in practice than the general vision, but I find it important to still clearly define them. It is very much a work in progress, and I invite open criticism on all ideas. Furthermore, I believe that the government's moral function is to actively cultivate virtue, discipline, and social harmony in its citizens, and ensure the welfare of the country across a time horizon extended beyond that of most private interests.

A not very modest proposal for the Economic, Social, and Environmental Transformation of New Zealand:

1. Vision and Guiding Principles

The work below outlines a comprehensive national reform programme for New Zealand, drawing on the successful models of Singapore, the German economic system, and El Salvador's security transformation. The goal is to transform NZ into a high-growth, low-tax, environmentally pristine nation with world-class infrastructure, education, and quality of life.

The reform rests on several core principles:

  • Near-zero income taxation funded by a sovereign wealth fund, resource royalties, and environmental levies
  • Individual sovereignty over health, education, and lifestyle decisions
  • A small but effective state focused on infrastructure, environmental protection, defence, and courts
  • Severe consequences for violent crime and environmental destruction
  • Economic opportunity as the primary mechanism for social mobility, replacing welfare dependency
  • World-class education producing capable, well-rounded citizens
  • Clean water, healthy food, and pharmaceutical independence as foundational public goods

2. Taxation

2.1 Income Tax

Personal income tax: flat 1% on all income. Corporate income tax: flat 1% on all profits. These rates apply universally with no brackets, thresholds, or complexity.

Current NZ rates for reference: personal income tax ranges from 10.5% to 39% progressively; corporate tax is a flat 28%. The reform represents a reduction of approximately 90–97% in income tax burden.

2.2 No GST

Goods and Services Tax is eliminated entirely. NZ currently charges 15% GST on most goods and services. Removal increases consumer purchasing power and simplifies business compliance.

2.3 No Land Value Tax

No new land value tax is introduced. Existing property taxes (council rates) remain unchanged at current levels.

2.4 Environmental and Food Levy

A graduated levy on companies based on the health and environmental quality of their products:

  • 0.1%: Companies producing whole, unprocessed food from NZ-grown ingredients
  • 5%: Companies importing or using moderately processed ingredients
  • 15%: Companies producing highly processed food or using environmentally harmful processes (transitional rate, first 2 years)
  • 30%: Companies producing highly processed food, fast food chains, or using environmentally harmful processes (full rate, enforced after 2-year notice period)

The 2-year notice period at 15% gives companies a clear window to reformulate. Fast food can be healthy if it uses healthy ingredients. A fast food chain using grass-fed NZ beef, real cheese, fresh vegetables, and seed-oil-free cooking drops to a lower tier. The levy punishes the ingredients, not the business model. Companies that reformulate are rewarded. Companies that refuse pay the full 30%.

This creates powerful price signals: healthy, locally produced food is near-free to produce, while the worst processed food carries a 30% cost penalty that fundamentally changes the economics of selling it in NZ.

2.5 Farmer Zero-Tax Incentive

Farms producing food that meets defined health and environmental standards pay 0.1% tax (not zero, so all financial flows remain visible to the state). Standards include: no seed oils in processing, minimal chemical inputs, soil health benchmarks, water quality compliance, and animal welfare standards. Non-compliant farms pay the standard 1% corporate tax plus the environmental levy.

Compliant farms are also eligible for state subsidies:

  • Equipment and infrastructure grants for transitioning to compliant practices (irrigation, soil testing, organic pest management)
  • Modest per-unit production subsidies for ongoing compliant output
  • Interest-free loans from the sovereign wealth fund for farm improvements, repayable only once generating revenue from compliant production

This positions NZ agriculture as a global premium brand: the world's cleanest food, produced by the world's best-supported farmers.

2.6 Environmental Remediation Companies

Companies whose primary activity is developing or deploying technology that measurably reduces pollution, restores ecosystems, or neutralises waste (e.g. plastic-eating algae, microplastic filtration, ocean cleanup, soil remediation) pay 0.1% corporate tax. The 0.1% rate (rather than zero) ensures all financial flows remain visible and prevents shell company abuse. Strict definition: the company's core business must be remediation, not simply branding as "green."


3. Revenue Model

With income taxes at 1% and no GST, alternative revenue sources fund the state:

3.1 Revenue Sources

Revenue Source

Est. Annual (Yr 1)

Est. Annual (Yr 15)

1% Personal Income Tax

$2–3B

$4–6B

1% Corporate Income Tax

$0.7–1B

$2–4B

Environmental/Food Levy (0.1–30%)

$4–8B

$8–15B

Resource Royalties (water, fish, minerals, spectrum)

$5–10B

$8–15B

Property Taxes (rates, unchanged)

$3–4B

$4–5B

Sovereign Wealth Fund Returns

$0–2B

$24–40B

SOE Dividends & Commercial Revenue

$5–8B

$8–12B

Fines & Enforcement Revenue

$0.5B

$0.5–1B

Public Sector Reduction Savings

$3–5B

$8–10B

TOTAL ESTIMATED

$25–40B

$65–110B

Current NZ government spending is approximately $183 billion. This model requires reducing government expenditure by 60–80% in the near term, scaling to a 40–50% reduction once the sovereign wealth fund matures. This is achievable through welfare elimination, healthcare restructuring, reduced bureaucracy, privatisation, and a dramatically smaller state footprint.

3.2 Public Sector Reduction

Currently 18% of NZ's workforce (approximately 250,000+ people) works for the government. Target: 8% within 10 years, modelled on Singapore's 5–6% public sector share. This means eliminating approximately 100,000–130,000 government positions.

Where cuts come from: large portions of the Ministry of Social Development (welfare eliminated), much of IRD (flat 1% tax is simple), building consent bureaucracy (deregulated), and redundant administrative functions across all departments. Functions that remain: courts, defence, environmental enforcement, the water authority, education administration, and the sovereign wealth fund.

Implementation: 3–5 year reduction plan. Natural attrition handles the first wave (don't replace departures). Voluntary redundancy packages handle the next tranche. Targeted cuts for functions that no longer exist. In a booming 1% tax economy, the private sector absorbs displaced workers. Estimated savings: $8–10 billion annually at full reduction.


4. Sovereign Wealth Fund

Modelled on Singapore's Temasek Holdings and GIC. The fund is the centrepiece of long-term fiscal sustainability, replacing income tax revenue with investment returns.

4.1 Phase 1: Consolidation (Years 1–3)

Consolidate all existing government commercial assets under a single sovereign investment vehicle: Mercury Energy, Meridian Energy, Genesis Energy, Air New Zealand stake, Kiwi Group Holdings (Kiwibank), NZ Post's commercial operations, and the NZ Super Fund. Estimated combined value: $90–120 billion. Capitalise further through resource royalty revenues flowing into the fund.

4.2 Phase 2: Strategic Domestic Investment (Years 3–7)

  • Energy infrastructure: Build to 100% renewable electricity, develop green hydrogen export capacity. Fund owns generation and transmission assets.
  • Port and logistics: Consolidate and modernise Auckland, Tauranga, and Lyttelton ports. Invest in automation and capacity. Revenue from port fees, warehousing, logistics.
  • Digital infrastructure: Fibre networks, data centres, subsea cable capacity. Attract data sovereignty clients across the Pacific.
  • Toll roads and transport: New motorways, tunnels, rail connections built and operated as toll infrastructure.
  • Film infrastructure: World-class studio complexes owned by the fund, leased to international productions.
  • Housing development zones: Fund buys land at rural prices, builds infrastructure, sells serviced lots at a margin.
  • Water and waste infrastructure: Modern treatment plants that generate revenue from biogas, biosolids, reclaimed water, and waste-to-energy.

4.3 Phase 3: Global Diversification (Years 7–15)

Once domestic portfolio generates stable returns, diversify internationally: global tech companies, real estate, infrastructure in growing economies, and financial instruments. Co-invest with partner nation sovereign funds (Norway's GPFG, Singapore's GIC, Japan's GPIF, Australia's Future Fund).

4.4 Target

Build the fund to $300–400 billion within 15 years through asset consolidation, resource royalties, and compounding at 8–10% annually. Annual returns of $24–40 billion provide a structural revenue source independent of taxation.

4.5 Protection

Constitutional entrenchment requiring a supermajority referendum to draw down principal. No government may raid the fund for short-term spending without direct public approval.


5. Resource Royalties and Fisheries

NZ's water, fisheries, minerals, and spectrum rights are currently underpriced or given away. Charging market rates for these commons generates significant revenue without taxing income.

5.1 Fisheries: Tiered Licensing

  • NZ citizens: standard commercial and recreational fishing licenses at base rates.
  • Permanent residents: premium rates at 2–3x citizen rates for commercial licenses. PRs benefit from the resource but have not made the full commitment of citizenship. This also incentivises PR-to-citizenship conversion for those who qualify.
  • Foreign-flagged vessels and foreign-owned commercial operations: highest premium royalty on all catch.
  • Recreational fishing permits for tourists: remain cheap and easy (tourists spend money in the broader economy).
  • Modelled on Iceland, Norway, and the Faroe Islands, which all restrict commercial fishing access to nationals.

5.2 Water Royalties

Commercial water extraction (bottling, industrial use, large-scale irrigation) pays volumetric royalties. Revenue flows into the sovereign wealth fund and water infrastructure investment.

5.3 Mineral and Spectrum Rights

Market-rate pricing for all mineral extraction rights and telecommunications spectrum allocation. NZ's Exclusive Economic Zone (one of the largest in the world) is a major asset for seabed minerals and fishing rights.


6. Infrastructure and City Revamp

6.1 Designated Development Zones

New development zones on city peripheries receive full infrastructure before any building starts:

  • Wastewater treatment plant (sized for full buildout capacity, not current population)
  • Stormwater management (wetlands, retention, treatment)
  • Solid waste processing (recycling, organic composting, waste-to-energy)
  • Power grid connection with full buildout capacity
  • Fibre broadband to every lot
  • Road network (arterials and collectors)
  • Public transport connection (bus rapid transit or rail link)
  • Green space and recreational areas (non-negotiable)

Within designated zones, building is almost completely deregulated subject only to safety standards.

6.2 Building Deregulation

Standards that remain:

  • Structural integrity and earthquake resistance
  • Non-toxic materials (no asbestos, formaldehyde-heavy composites, lead, off-gassing materials)
  • Non-environmentally toxic materials
  • Moisture and mould management
  • Fire safety basics
  • Environmental discharge controls (no construction runoff into waterways)

Restrictions removed:

  • All height limits
  • Minimum lot sizes
  • Setback requirements and yard mandates (beyond fire and access)
  • Slow multi-stage consent processes (replaced with 14-day automatic consent if safety standards are met in designated zones)
  • Aesthetic and character controls (except genuinely historic buildings, strictly defined)
  • Parking minimums

6.3 Existing City Revamp

Each city is divided into three categories:

Intensification zones: Areas near existing transport corridors and town centres. All height and density restrictions removed. Priority infrastructure upgrades funded by the sovereign wealth fund.

Greenfield expansion zones: New designated development zones on city periphery with full infrastructure-first treatment.

Conservation zones: Areas of genuine ecological value, productive farmland, and natural landscape permanently protected from development.

6.4 Demolition and Rebuild

Demolition and rebuild from scratch is explicitly an option for poorly built, badly planned, or infrastructure-constrained neighbourhoods. The process:

  • Voluntary buyout at fair market value plus a 10–20% relocation premium
  • Displaced residents get priority access to new housing in nearby development zones at cost (no developer margin)
  • Business relocation support: temporary premises during reconstruction plus moving cost coverage
  • Staged demolition and rebuild, working in blocks so residents can see finished results before deciding
  • Compulsory acquisition as a last resort for holdouts blocking critical infrastructure

Priority rebuild targets:

  • Auckland: Older South Auckland suburbs (Manukau, Otara, Mangere), industrial zones (Penrose, Mt Wellington), CBD fringe areas
  • Wellington: Earthquake-prone CBD buildings, unstable-ground suburbs (parts of Kilbirnie, Miramar)
  • Christchurch: Remaining vacant red-zone land and patched-up buildings that should have been replaced
  • Hamilton, Tauranga, Dunedin: Town centre intensification and ageing housing stock replacement

6.5 City-Specific Plans

Auckland: Massive intensification along rail corridors (Pukekohe to CBD, Western and Eastern lines). Complete and extend City Rail Link. New development zones north (beyond Silverdale) and south (beyond Drury). Major wastewater system upgrade sized for 3–4 million population. Sovereign wealth fund takes over rail and development directly.

Wellington: Seismic resilience alongside densification. High-density construction along Hutt Valley and Kapiti rail lines. New development zones in Hutt Valley and Porirua on stable ground.

Christchurch: Release remaining red-zone land as intensification zone. Modern infrastructure investment. Target as NZ's most affordable city.

Hamilton, Tauranga, Dunedin: Expansion zones on periphery, intensification in existing centres, conservation zones protecting surrounding farmland. Target affordable end of housing market.

6.6 Solving the Government Contractor Problem

Current problems: cost-plus contracting rewarding waste, oligopoly among NZ construction firms, bureaucratic procurement, scope creep, and zero accountability for failure. Solutions:

  • Fixed-price, design-build contracts with penalties. Contractor bids total price and completion date. Under budget, they keep savings. Over budget, they absorb losses. Late delivery incurs liquidated damages per day.
  • Open international competition. Remove barriers for foreign construction firms. If a Korean or Japanese firm builds for 40% less in half the time, let them. Require meaningful local workforce percentage for skills transfer.
  • Sovereign wealth fund as direct developer. The fund develops infrastructure as an investment, employing its own project managers and contracting subcontractors directly. Profit motive ensures efficiency. Modelled on Singapore's HDB.
  • Performance-based public scorecards. Every contractor gets a public score: on-time delivery, budget adherence, quality, safety. Below 70%: banned from government work for two years. Above 90%: preferred status.
  • Modular and prefabricated construction at scale. Sovereign wealth fund invests in large-scale prefab manufacturing. Standardised modules meeting safety standards, assembled in days. 30–50% cost reduction versus traditional construction.

7. Housing

7.1 The Goal

Any person on $15,000 annual income should be able to buy a house and sustain a family on a single income. This is the end goal. Current median house price is approximately $787,000, making this a 90%+ reduction target, achievable only through systemic reform.

7.2 Mechanisms

  • Eliminate speculative demand. With 1% corporate tax and a booming economy, capital flows away from property speculation into productive investment. Why park money in a rental at 3–4% when business investment offers far higher returns?
  • Mass deregulation of building. Height limits, density restrictions, lot minimums, slow consent processes all removed (as per Section 6.2).
  • International construction competition. Break the Fletcher Building duopoly. Allow international firms and prefab manufacturers to compete, cutting construction costs 30–50%.
  • Sovereign wealth fund as land developer. Fund buys rural land at agricultural prices, builds infrastructure, sells serviced lots at a margin. Land value uplift funds the infrastructure.
  • Sovereign wealth fund as lender. Offers mortgages at cost (no profit margin on interest), with 30–40 year terms. Removes bank profit from the housing equation.

7.3 Compulsory Savings Scheme

Modelled on Singapore's Central Provident Fund (CPF). Every worker contributes a defined percentage of income into a personal account. A large portion is ring-fenced exclusively for housing purchase. Employer contributions are also mandatory. Even at 1% income tax, the effective total deduction remains far below current NZ tax rates.

Example: a $15,000 earner saving 15% ($2,250/year) plus 10% employer contribution ($1,500/year) accumulates roughly $37,500 plus returns over 10 years. Combined with a prefab home at $80,000–120,000 in a development zone and SWF lending at near-zero margin, home ownership becomes achievable.

7.4 Economic Growth as the Ultimate Lever

If the 1% tax model works and the economy booms, a $15,000 income today may become $25,000–35,000 in a growing economy with full employment and labour scarcity pushing wages up. At $30,000 income with a $120,000 house, the ratio is 4x, which is achievable.


8. Environmental Protection

Environmental policy focuses on tangible, measurable outcomes: land health, biodiversity, water purity, ocean protection, and food quality. It is decoupled from broader climate policy ideology.

8.1 Enforcement

  • Personal littering: $500–$2,000 fines (modelled on Singapore)
  • Commercial littering: $10,000–$100,000 fines
  • Illegal dumping or toxic waste: criminal prosecution with prison time
  • Tourists convicted of environmental damage: banned from re-entry to NZ
  • Companies polluting rivers or land: massive fines modelled on Singapore and Russia

8.2 Biodiversity and Land

  • Permanent conservation zones protecting native bush, wetlands, and ecological corridors
  • Predator eradication programmes funded by resource royalties
  • Native species protection with measurable population targets

8.3 Water Purity

  • Catchment area protection from agricultural runoff and industrial contamination
  • Strict land-use controls for all watersheds feeding city water supplies
  • Farmer incentives (zero-tax status) tied directly to water quality compliance

8.4 Ocean

  • NZ's Exclusive Economic Zone (one of the world's largest) managed as a revenue-generating asset
  • Proper charging for all access: fishing, seabed activity, shipping lanes
  • Revenue from the EEZ funds both the sovereign wealth fund and ocean protection enforcement

8.5 Remediation Technology Incentives

  • 0.1% corporate tax for remediation companies (plastic-eating algae, microplastic filtration, ocean cleanup, soil remediation, chemical neutralisation) — 0.1% rather than zero to maintain financial visibility
  • Sovereign wealth fund takes equity stakes in promising remediation companies
  • Government procurement preference for remediation firms on cleanup contracts (fixed-price, performance-based)
  • Immigration fast-track for environmental scientists and engineers

8.6 Food Quality

The graduated environmental/food levy (Section 2.4) creates powerful price signals. At 30% for the worst offenders, the economics of selling unhealthy processed food in NZ fundamentally change. Companies have a 2-year notice period at 15% to reformulate their products. Fast food chains that switch to healthy NZ-sourced ingredients drop to lower tiers. The levy punishes the ingredients, not the business model. Additionally:

  • 0.1% tax plus subsidies for farms meeting health and environmental standards
  • NZ positions itself as the global leader in clean, premium food production

9. Clean Water Infrastructure

Every NZ city will have world-class drinking water exceeding current standards, comparable to Switzerland, Austria, and Scandinavia.

9.1 Source Protection

If a river or aquifer feeds a city's water supply, the entire catchment is a conservation zone with strict land-use controls. Agricultural runoff, industrial contamination, and development are prohibited in catchment areas.

9.2 Multi-Barrier Treatment

  • Coagulation and flocculation (particulate removal)
  • Advanced filtration including activated carbon for chemical contaminants
  • UV disinfection (effective without chemical residues)
  • Heavy metal and microplastic filtration (PFAS, pharmaceutical residues, microplastics)
  • Post-treatment real-time monitoring throughout distribution network

9.3 Fluoride: Opt-In Model

Clean, unfluoridated water is the default supply. People who want fluoride access it through toothpaste, dental treatments, or supplements. Consistent with the principle of individual health sovereignty: the state does not add medication to the water supply without individual consent.

9.4 Pipe Network Replacement

National programme to replace all sub-standard pipes (including any lead or asbestos cement components) within 10 years. Funded by the sovereign wealth fund as infrastructure investment.

9.5 Operation Model

A standalone water authority modelled on Singapore's PUB (Public Utilities Board) manages the entire water cycle: catchment, treatment, distribution, wastewater, and quality monitoring as an integrated system. Revenue from volumetric water charges: basic allocation at low or no cost for essential use, higher rates for heavy commercial and industrial use.

9.6 Timeline

  • Major cities (Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch): upgraded treatment plants within 3–5 years
  • Secondary cities and towns: within 5–10 years
  • National pipe network replacement: 10–15 years
  • Real-time monitoring: deployed as systems are upgraded

10. Healthcare: Conditional Model

10.1 Tier 1: Free Healthcare

Available to individuals who meet annual health markers: blood pressure within normal range, BMI within a defined band (adjusted for age and sex), blood glucose below pre-diabetic thresholds, cholesterol within guidelines. Annual check-ups are mandatory and free. If you meet the markers, all healthcare is covered by the state.

10.2 Tier 2: Supported Transition

For obese individuals, the state sponsors pharmacological intervention (semaglutide/Ozempic, retatrutide, tirzepatide). It is cheaper to fund medication that prevents diabetes, heart disease, and joint replacement than to treat those conditions later. Recipients must show measurable progress. If prescribed retatrutide and losing weight consistently, they stay in the programme. If they don't engage, they transition to co-payments.

10.3 Tier 3: Co-Payment Model

Individuals who don't meet health markers and don't engage with supported transition pay scaled co-payments. Self-induced conditions are explicitly not exempt: type 2 diabetes from lifestyle, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity-related joint issues, smoking-related conditions. Co-payments create direct financial incentive to maintain health.

10.4 Tier 4: Genetic/Disability Assessment

People with congenital conditions, disabilities, or chronic illnesses not caused by lifestyle choices undergo independent medical assessment. If confirmed, the state covers their healthcare provisionally. Migration assistance overseas is offered as an additional optional pathway for those whose needs may be better served by another country's healthcare system. This is an option alongside domestic coverage, not a replacement.


11. Pharmaceutical Independence

The state provides information and access, not mandates. The medical system is restructured to serve patients independently of pharmaceutical company commercial interests.

11.1 Vaccines: Informed Choice

  • Vaccination is genuinely voluntary with full informed consent
  • Every parent receives complete, government-produced information based on raw clinical trial data (not manufacturer brochures): disease risk in NZ, side effects and frequency, ingredients
  • All institutional penalties for choosing not to vaccinate are removed: no childcare exclusions, school enrolment barriers, or differential healthcare treatment
  • Vaccines remain free and available for those who want them
  • Independent, actively funded vaccine safety monitoring (not passive reporting) tracking health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations over time, run by a body with no pharmaceutical funding

11.2 SSRIs and Psychiatric Medication

  • SSRIs and psychiatric medications require specialist referral (psychiatrist or clinical psychologist) before prescription. GPs can no longer prescribe as first-line response.
  • Non-pharmaceutical first-line treatment is mandatory before medication: exercise programmes, CBT, dietary assessment, sleep hygiene, social connection support
  • Transparent prescribing data published by practice and region, with reviews triggered for outlier prescribing rates
  • Pharmaceutical company influence removed from medical education: ban on company sponsorship of GP training, conferences, and continuing education
  • Full informed consent with comprehensive side-effect disclosure including withdrawal effects, sexual side effects, emotional blunting, and actual efficacy data versus placebo

11.3 Birth Control

  • Hormonal birth control no longer prescribed as first-line for non-contraceptive reasons (acne, period pain, mood). Underlying causes investigated first.
  • Full informed consent for all contraceptive prescriptions covering hormonal effects comprehensively
  • Fertility awareness methods presented as a legitimate option alongside hormonal and barrier methods
  • No pharmaceutical company involvement in contraceptive education

11.4 Systemic Reforms

  • Ban direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising (NZ is one of only two countries allowing this)
  • No pharmaceutical company funding of medical research that informs public health policy
  • No pharmaceutical representatives visiting GP practices or hospitals
  • Independent national formulary committee evaluating medications on independent evidence
  • Transparency requirements for all financial relationships between pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers, researchers, or policy advisors

12. Welfare System

The welfare system is dismantled and replaced with economic opportunity, compulsory savings, and conditional healthcare.

12.1 Rationale

With a booming 1% tax economy, plentiful jobs, and a compulsory savings scheme providing housing and retirement security, the structural need for welfare is eliminated. The compulsory savings scheme (modelled on Singapore's CPF) replaces welfare with personal asset accumulation.

12.2 National Incentive Products

Modelled on programmes similar to Germany's economic recovery: direct national incentive programmes connecting citizens with productive work, skills development, and economic participation. The goal is full employment through opportunity, not dependency through transfers.

12.3 Transition

Existing welfare recipients are transitioned over a defined period (2–3 years) into employment, training programmes, or the compulsory savings scheme. During transition, existing benefits taper rather than cut immediately.


13. Criminal Justice

13.1 Capital Punishment

Capital punishment is reinstated for violent offenders (murder, rape, serious assault) and drug trafficking. Modelled on Singapore's system: severe, clearly defined consequences applied consistently. Violent offenders are not indefinitely supported by the state through expensive prison systems.

13.2 El Salvador-Style Gang Crackdown

El Salvador's homicide rate declined by more than 98% from 2015 to 2024 (from 53.1 to 1.9 per 100,000) through aggressive enforcement. NZ applies similar principles:

  • Suspension of certain legal protections to enable mass arrests of known gang members (Mongrel Mob, Black Power, Head Hunters, King Cobras)
  • Seizure of all gang assets and properties
  • Severe sentencing for drug trafficking and violent offences
  • Combined with economic opportunity: abundant jobs and low taxes remove the economic incentive for gang recruitment

The approach attacks gangs from both ends: removing existing structures by force, and removing the economic conditions that create new recruits.

13.3 Executive Criminal Liability

Companies can never pay their way out of environmental crimes, violations of standards outlined in this document, or fraud. Fines exist as additional penalties on top of criminal prosecution, but never replace it. No settlement agreements, no consent orders, no negotiated outcomes. If a law is broken, prosecution proceeds regardless of what the company offers to pay.

A specific offence category, "Executive Criminal Liability," applies to all violations in this reform framework:

  • Any director or senior executive of a company that commits an environmental crime, food standard violation, or fraud is presumed to have authorised the conduct unless they can demonstrate they took active steps to prevent it
  • The burden shifts to the executive to prove they weren't responsible, rather than requiring the state to prove they were
  • Penalties include prison time, personal asset seizure, and lifetime bans from holding directorship positions
  • Modelled on Singapore's corporate liability provisions where executives face personal prosecution and prison for corporate crimes

This means environmental destruction, food standard fraud, and financial fraud carry personal consequences for the humans who make the decisions, not just balance sheet costs for the corporate entity.

13.4 Environmental Enforcement

  • Littering fines: $500–$2,000 personal, $10,000–$100,000 commercial
  • Illegal dumping and toxic waste: criminal prosecution with prison time
  • Tourist environmental offenders: banned from NZ re-entry

14. Trade and International Partnerships

14.1 Priority Partner Nations

Norway, Sweden, Singapore, Japan, Australia, United States, Germany.

14.2 Trade Agreement Structure

  • Bilateral free trade agreements with zero or near-zero tariffs on goods and services
  • Mutual recognition of professional qualifications (engineers, doctors, accountants, lawyers)
  • Investment treaties with sovereign wealth fund cooperation (co-investment with Norway's GPFG, Singapore's GIC, Japan's GPIF, Australia's Future Fund)
  • Technology transfer agreements: manufacturing (Japan, Germany), urban planning (Singapore), energy and environmental tech (Norway, Sweden)

14.3 Growth Sectors

  • Technology: 1% corporate tax attracts tech companies. Aggressive skilled migration. Investment in university CS programmes. Digital infrastructure from the sovereign fund. NZ as a "Pacific tech hub" between Asian and American markets.
  • Film industry: Near-zero tax plus existing crew expertise and landscapes. SWF-owned studio infrastructure leased to productions. Economic multiplier stays domestic.
  • Tourism: High-value, premium nature tourism rather than volume. Clean environment is the product. NZ as the "Patagonia of the Pacific" — a luxury nature destination.
  • Agriculture: Zero-tax farms producing the world's cleanest, healthiest food. Premium global brand.
  • Energy: 100% renewable electricity, green hydrogen export. SWF-owned generation and transmission.

15. Immigration

15.1 Tier 1: Pathway to Citizenship

Capped, highly selective. Annual intake of 10,000–20,000 adjusted by economic need. Criteria:

  • High skill: qualification, demonstrated expertise, or entrepreneurial track record
  • Health: must meet the same annual health markers as the conditional healthcare system
  • Age: productive working age (approximately 22–45), with exceptions for exceptional talent
  • From partner nations or demonstrating equivalent standards
  • Must be a genuine net addition to NZ: filling a skill gap, bringing capital, or creating jobs
  • Fast-track for environmental scientists, engineers, software engineers, AI researchers, and other critical skills

15.2 Permanent Resident Review

Existing permanent residents do not automatically gain citizenship. There is no automatic pathway from PR to citizenship. All PRs wishing to become citizens must pass a review assessing whether they meet the new Tier 1 immigration standards (skill level, health markers, age, net contribution).

Transition: existing PRs receive a 2-year grace period to apply for citizenship under current rules. After that window closes, all new citizenship applications (including from existing PRs who did not apply) are assessed under the new criteria. This is firm but not retroactively punitive.

PRs who do not gain citizenship retain their residency but with differentiated access: higher fishing license rates, no voting rights, and potentially different access to certain government services. This creates a meaningful distinction between citizenship and permanent residency, and a tangible incentive to meet citizenship standards.

15.3 Foreign Worker Visa (No Citizenship Pathway)

Modelled on the Saudi/Gulf iqama system, with Singapore-level worker protections:

  • Defined period (2–5 years) for specific roles
  • No permanent residency, no family reunification rights, no citizenship pathway
  • Strong labour protections while in NZ: minimum wage compliance, housing standards, workplace safety
  • Purpose: provide labour during buildout phase without permanent demographic pressure

15.4 Birthright Citizenship Reform

Citizenship by birth is no longer automatic based on geography alone. Birthright citizenship applies only if:

  • At least one parent is a NZ citizen
  • Parents are first-generation immigrants who gained citizenship through the Tier 1 pathway (i.e. they met the immigration standards)
  • Family is second-generation immigrant (grandparents immigrated, parents grew up in NZ): children are citizens automatically

Children born in NZ to Tier 2 temporary workers or to families that do not meet immigration requirements do not gain citizenship by birth. Families must meet the existing immigration requirements for birthright citizenship to apply. This prevents birth tourism and ensures citizenship is tied to genuine integration and contribution.

15.5 Immigration as Trade Incentive

Tier 1 citizenship pathways are offered as incentives within trade agreements with partner nations (Norway, Sweden, Singapore, Japan, Australia, US, Germany), encouraging high-skill migration from the world's most capable populations.


16. Education System

16.1 IQ Testing and Assessment

Standardised cognitive testing reintroduced in all schools. Annual testing from age 7 to 15. Purpose: diagnostic, not punitive. Used for placement into appropriate educational tracks and early identification of both gifted students and those needing additional support.

16.2 German Three-Track Model

After primary school (ages 5–12), students are assessed and streamed into three tracks:

Academic Track (Gymnasium equivalent): For students with high academic ability. 6 years (ages 13–18). Rigorous curriculum: classical education, advanced mathematics, sciences, English literature and composition, history, philosophy, and at least one foreign language. Prepares for university. Culminates in qualification equivalent to Cambridge International A Levels.

Technical-Professional Track (Realschule equivalent): For students with strong applied intelligence. 5 years (ages 13–17). Mathematics, science, English, and technology with emphasis on application. Includes engineering principles, computer science, business, and trade fundamentals. Graduates enter polytechnics, apprenticeships, or skilled employment.

Vocational Track (Hauptschule equivalent): For students oriented toward practical work. 4 years (ages 13–16). Core literacy and numeracy plus intensive vocational training. Workplace placements from age 14. Graduates enter apprenticeships or direct employment.

Critical principle: tracks are not prisons. Students can move between tracks based on annual reassessment. Fluid, not rigid.

16.3 Curriculum: Classical Foundation with Modern Rigour

Modelled on the Crimson Education approach: personalised academic strategy, depth over breadth, targeted preparation, and mentorship.

English: Rhetoric, argumentation, persuasive writing. Primary texts: Homer, Plato, Shakespeare, Locke, Mill. Students produce 3,000-word essays and deliver structured 15-minute oral arguments by graduation.

Mathematics: Taught as a language of reasoning. Academic track through calculus and statistics. Technical track: applied mathematics, accounting, data analysis. Vocational track: practical numeracy and trade mathematics. Problem-solving over memorisation.

Sciences: Physics, chemistry, biology with heavy practical components. NZ's natural environment used as a teaching resource. Field work, not just textbooks.

History and Philosophy: Connected disciplines. Evidence evaluation, bias identification, historical argumentation, philosophical engagement with governance, ethics, and society. Thucydides alongside the Treaty of Waitangi. Aristotle's Politics alongside Singapore's governance model.

Foreign Languages: Mandatory for academic track. Strategic options: Japanese, German, Mandarin, alongside te reo Maori.

Physical Education: Rigorous, not optional. Tied to the health-conditional model. Students who develop fitness habits young are more likely to meet health markers qualifying for free healthcare as adults.

16.4 Crimson-Style Personalisation at National Scale

  • Individual academic planning from age 13 for every student entering a track
  • Mentorship networks: academic track students paired with university academics and researchers; technical track with engineers, developers, and business leaders; vocational track with master tradespeople and business owners
  • National competitions in mathematics, science, debate, engineering, and trade skills. Scholarships and public recognition for top performers.
  • University preparation as a core function of the academic track: explicitly prepare students for competitive domestic and international university entry

16.5 Teacher Quality

  • Selective entry into teaching (academic track teachers must be genuine subject experts)
  • Performance-based pay: teachers whose students consistently exceed benchmarks earn more
  • Fast removal of underperforming teachers
  • International recruitment from partner nations (German physics teachers, Japanese mathematics teachers, Singaporean computer science teachers)
  • 1% income tax makes the profession more financially attractive without requiring massive government pay increases

16.6 Hiring Freedom for Companies

All restrictions on hiring metrics removed. Companies are free to use cognitive testing, personality assessments, skills tests, IQ scores, and any other criteria they determine is predictive of job performance. In a booming, labour-scarce economy, market pressure prevents irrational discrimination more effectively than regulation.


I was encouraged to post this and invite further discussion.

Criticized1*
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
3rd of 3 versions

A lot of policies you describe are not explained. A simple, high level explanation of the goals of each section would go a long way. One or two sentences each at least. I would like to know how you have arrived at your policy ideas, not just what they are.

For example: what is the purpose of the 1% tax? Why are you rolling back building regulations? What is the proper role of government in education? What is the goal of your immigration policy?

Criticism of #4420