Veritula – Meta

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.

Veritula should have a section with a list of all its current members.

For now, people just have profiles.

But having a list of members would build a sense of rapport between the participants.

And would promote a greater flow of communication.

#501 · · Tom Nassis, 8 months ago · context · CriticismCriticized1 criticim(s)

Good idea. I’ve added this to my list of features to implement.

#504 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 8 months ago

#550 · · Tom Nassis, 8 months ago
#550 · expand
#504 · expand

Done as of 6251b6a, see veritula.com/members.

#514 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 8 months ago · Criticism of #501

Thank you, Dennis.👍

#551 · · Tom Nassis, 8 months ago
#551 · expand
#514 · expand

[H]aving a list of members would build a sense of rapport between the participants.

Just so you know, although I’ve implemented the list of members, I do want to be clear that Veritula is not meant for socializing.

#515 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 8 months ago

I know what you mean, but Veritula unavoidably facilitates public (i.e. social) interactions, no? Of a certain kind, to be clear. Ideas, ideas, ideas.

#553 · · Tom Nassis revised 8 months ago · 2nd of 2 versions

Well, discussions are necessarily a ‘social’ activity in that they involve at least two people, yes. I just don’t want Veritula to be yet another social network.

In a mixed society, people can prioritize truth seeking or fitting in but not both.

#562 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 8 months ago
#562 · expand
#553 · expand
#515 · expand
#501 · expand