Can qualia be separated from personhood?

Showing only ideas leading to #5035.

See full discussion​·​See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
Tyler Mills’s avatar
Only version leading to #5035 (3 total)

Assumption A1: Only programs that are people can, while running, constitute qualia/experience/subjectivity/consciousness.

Criticized1*
Tyler Mills’s avatar
2nd of 2 versions leading to #5035 (2 total)

A quale can be recorded and replayed later, arbitrarily many times. That looping program is not a person: it can only create whatever knowledge it originally did, not any possible knowledge, maybe until freed from the loop. Yet it still constitutes experience.
So people are not the only programs that can be qualia.

Criticism of #4881
Tyler Mills’s avatar

A looping quale is also not a person because personhood is not just: can create a given piece of new knowledge, it is: can create any knowledge (not just that created by this quale; again assuming knowledge creation defines qualia).

Tyler Mills’s avatar

Should clarify that personhood is: can create any new knowledge in principle (excluding resource constraints). A program consisting of a looping quale cannot create any possible knowledge, whether or not it is creating some each time it's run.