Veritula – Meta

Showing only ideas leading to #5150 and its comments.

See full discussion​·​See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
Tyler Mills’s avatar

I question whether previous versions of a criticism should contribute to the battle-tested count, as they do currently. Someone can make a spelling correction to the criticism, which creates the "supersedes" criticism of that previous version of the criticism, and that then contributes to the battle-tested count. This seems wrong, since that counter-criticism is not substantive, and even if it were, OP only generally responds to the latest version of a criticism (may not even have known about previous versions; all of this happened in: https://veritula.com/ideas/5089-knowledge-growth-such-as-in-genes-in-the-biospher).

Criticized2*
Tyler Mills’s avatar
2nd of 2 versions

But sometimes revisions can be substantive, and OP could defend against one version, and in that case it should count toward the battle-tested badge!

Criticism of #5148
👍Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Yep. Was going to say this, too. The system has no semantic way to check the content of a criticism. So it has to assume that every unaddressed criticism is substantive.

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

But the system does have a way to identify automatically generated criticisms.

Criticism of #5153Criticized1
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

It does, but it has no universal way to semantically check why a criticism was generated this way. All it knows is that the criticism was generated as part of a superseding revision, but it doesn’t know the meaning of the contents of that revision.

Criticism of #5154