Revisions of #522

Contributors: Dennis Hackethal

I don’t see why nonexistence cannot also be a logical possibility.

If nonexistence is logically possible, and existence is logically possible, we need to explain why the former has been physicalized in the first place.

(Logan Chipkin)

Version 1·#522·Dennis Hackethal·about 1 year ago·Criticism
2 comments: #523 and #526

I don’t see why nonexistence cannot also be a logical possibility.

If nonexistence is logically possible, and existence is logically possible, we need to explain why the former has been physicalized in the first place.

(Logan Chipkin)

I don’t see why nonexistence cannot also be a logical possibility.

If nonexistence is logically possible, and existence is logically possible, we need to explain why the latter has been physicalized in the first place.

(Logan Chipkin)

Version 2·#525·Dennis Hackethal·about 1 year ago·Criticism
3 comments: #527, #546, and #1195