Tyler suggested (#3904) we use the chart type from Kialo:

Could be a useful visualization in addition to trees.

Each top-level idea would be the center node. Then red segments around it for pending criticisms. Gray for non-pending criticisms and neutral comments.

Unlike Kialo, though, each segment would have the same size as the other segments on its circle.

Tyler suggested (#3904) we use the chart type from Kialo:

Could be a useful visualization in addition to trees.

Each top-level idea would be the center node. Then red segments around it for pending criticisms. Gray for non-pending criticisms and neutral comments.

Unlike Kialo, though, segments with the same parent would all be the same size: they’d split their parent’s arc equally between them.

Tyler suggested (#3904) we use the chart type from Kialo:

Could be a useful visualization in addition to trees.

Each top-level idea would be the center node. Then red segments around it for pending criticisms. Gray for non-pending criticisms and neutral comments.

Unlike Kialo, though, segments with the same parent would all be the same size: they’d split their parent’s arc equally between them.

Tyler suggested (#3904) we use the chart type from Kialo:

Could be a useful visualization in addition to trees.

Each top-level idea would be the center node, with its replies in segments around it. They’d be colored like the visual tree’s discs: the idea blue, criticisms red, and comments gray, solid if rationally adoptable and hollow if not.

Unlike Kialo, though, segments with the same parent would all be the same size: they’d split their parent’s arc equally between them.