Objectivist Criticisms of Anarcho-Capitalism

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.

The anarchists do not object to retaliatory force, only to it being wielded by a government. Why? Because, they say, it excludes "competitors." It sure does: it excludes vigilantes, lynch mobs, terrorists, and anyone else wanting to use force subjectively.

Competing arbitration agencies would develop objective (ie, non-arbitrary) laws and rules for coordination. And, just like governments, they would defend their customers against anyone who wants to use force subjectively. That’s their value proposition; their income relies on it.

#902 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months ago · context · 1st of 4 versions · CriticismCriticized1 criticim(s)

Superseded by #906. This comment was generated automatically.

#907 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months ago · Criticism of #902
#907 · expand

But if anyone could make his own laws based on whim, that would be arbitrary, no?

#908 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months ago · Criticism of #902Criticized1 criticim(s)

Anyone who tried to make ‘laws’ based on whim which, say, allow him to rob his neighbor, would be immediately greeted by the machine guns of that neighbor’s private protection service and their objective rules for engagement.

#909 · · Dennis HackethalOP, 7 months ago · Criticism of #908
#909 · expand
#908 · expand
#902 · expand