Search

Ideas that are…

Search Ideas


1808 ideas match your query.:

Sanctimonious/preachy

#2724​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

I implemented #2659 and it’s much better now. In addition, there is now automated archiving (#2704) and manual archiving (#2711). Archived ideas live on a separate page, so the main page is faster.

#2723​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

I went ahead and implemented this feature since it was a good suggestion.

You can edit your discussion here.

#2721​·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 11 months ago​·​Original #2306​·​CriticismArchived

This is not applicable anymore.

#2716​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Now that diffs are formatted, they don’t omit unchanged lines anymore.

#2712​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​Criticism

Proposed solution: allow people to archive ideas. Maybe only their own.

#2711​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​Archived

That could just annoy people and cause them to unsubscribe from emails.

#2710​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Could do it only for ideas with pending criticisms. If they have pending criticisms, how important can they be? This has the added benefit of creating an incentive for proponents of ideas to address criticisms.

#2709​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

People might just forget to do this.

#2707​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

This requires manual action. Could mean a lot of work depending on the discussion.

#2705​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Proposed solution: ideas could be archived automatically if they haven’t been revised or criticized in 90 days, say.

#2704​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​Archived

This problem will surface rarely – users would have to hit cmd + f immediately upon opening the page. For most users, by the time they start typing, the page is already fully loaded. So this seems like a small price to pay in exchange for discussion pages that always render faster.

#2696​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Now that parts of the page are purposely and visually disabled (see #2694), users may not expect everything to be working 100% during a loading state.

#2695​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

I now purposely prevent interactions with buttons and gutters, and gray them out, until the page is fully loaded. So instead of broken hover effects and interactions, the user gets intentionally disabled elements, and this intentionality is communicated to them.

Once the page is fully loaded, buttons and gutters are enabled and visually restored.

Since the browser’s loading indicator remains visible until then, this behavior shouldn’t violate user expectation.

#2694​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

That means duplicate functionality; anytime I customize Devise in the future, I’ll have to remember to adjust this one method as well.

#2693​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

I could extract discussions#show into a new, separate StreamController or something like it. That controller would not use Devise.

#2691​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Then again, I’d want to redirect users to the sign-in page (and then ideally back to where they were trying to go).

#2690​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Duplicate of #2677/#2683.

#2685​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

While ideas load, cmd +f won’t work.

#2684​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

I could render the first ~10 top-level ideas immediately and only render the rest as turbo frames off screen. By the time the user scrolls down, they should all be loaded.

#2683​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Yes, it would be even worse than #2677 (see criticism #2681), where only top-level ideas were turbo frames.

#2682​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​Archived

Too many requests when there are enough top-level ideas.

#2681​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

That means cmd + f won’t always work.

#2678​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

For large discussions, wouldn’t that flood the server with requests?

#2676​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

This page used to take ~3.5 seconds to load. Now it renders within 600ms :)

#2668​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 11 months ago​·​Archived