Search Ideas
14 ideas match your query.:
Fair. I don't know much about the laws around this but I'll take your word for it.
I can also think of ways this could be misused.
Edit: This alone is not a sufficient argument to discredit laws against defamation.
Yeah fair. I'll admit, my example is rather contrived. My hope was to show that one could in principle maintain a belief in god in a rational fashion, at least for a time. However, just because it is theoretically possible doesn't mean that it is at all likely. I agree that this isn't what is usually going with believers.
The idea that irrationality is a property of minds rather than individual ideas is interesting, I hadn't considered it.
There's this nice bit in Man, Economy & State where Rothbard explains that durable goods can be broken down into their unit services (not sure that's the term) and that all durable goods get used up as they provide service.
So I guess someone would reduce the serviceable lifespan of the bike by using it during the times that you aren't using it.
Okay well I have never thought of it in those terms. I definitely think NDAs should be enforceable.
Maybe? Kinda? Not sure.
You don't get to use your knife to aggress on others, that much is clear. So perhaps this can be understood as a right of others to do certain things with your property.
I'm not sure, seriously. I'm open to suggestions.
There's lots of things that I think people shouldn't do yet should still be legal.
That could be happening though, so agreed that it isn't a good argument.