Search

Ideas that are…

543 ideas match your query.:

Search ideas

It does when those others are responsible for your position. See #133, #138, #172, #203.

#218 · Dennis Hackethal, 3 months ago · revision of #217 · Criticism

It does when those others are responsible for your position. See #133, #172, #203.

#217 · Dennis Hackethal, 3 months ago · CriticismCriticized1 criticim(s)

having rights doesn't mean you get to be supported by others that don't want to support you

#216 · Dennis Hackethal, 3 months ago · CriticismCriticized1 criticim(s)

Anything that processes information is a computer.

The brain processes information.

Therefore, the brain is a computer.

#215 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago

If you want the abortion to happen as early as possible, then shame is the last thing you want, as it will cause pregnant women to put off the decision for fear of being shamed.

#214 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

Preventing unwanted pregnancy is the goal. Ending an unwanted pregnancy should happen with shame and as early as possible. It’s a mistake that gets worse with time.

#213 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticized1 criticim(s)

Right, but the absence of a functioning nervous system implies the absence of sentience [see #107]. So I don’t think it’s arbitrary.

#212 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

It’s arbitrary. A functioning nervous system does not imply complex thought.

#211 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · CriticismCriticized1 criticim(s)

But if an accident removes the entire brain yet the body somehow stays alive like a vegetable, then yeah I’d say it’s okay to pull the plug.
Is that fair? It’s interesting how abortion and euthanasia are kind of related in this way.

#210 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago

Superseded by #208. This comment was generated automatically.

#209 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

I think it’s not okay to kill someone whose nervous system stops working later in life if it may work again.
They’ve already been a person and may well continue to be a person. That can’t be said of an organism that has never had a nervous system.

#208 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · revision of #206 · Criticism

They’re already a person […].

Not at the time the nervous system is broken and the creative program isn’t running. Personhood has ‘halted’.

#207 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

I think it’s not okay to kill someone whose nervous system stops working later in life if it may work again.
They’re already a person and may well continue to be a person. That can’t be said of an organism that has never had a nervous system.

#206 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · CriticismCriticized2 criticim(s)

If my nervous system isn’t working because of coma, is it ok to kill me?

Clarity is suggesting it wouldn’t be okay, thus whether the nervous system is functional can’t be the determining factor.

#205 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · CriticismCriticized1 criticim(s)

That the baby can’t survive outside the womb sounds like an additional reason to carry to term, not a reason not to do it.

#204 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

Except in cases of rape, the mother is responsible for the baby’s existence.

#203 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

A baby with a nervous system may be a person and thus have rights.

#202 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

If the fetus has "developed a nervous system" but is not yet capable of surviving outside the mother (even with all the technological knowledge of medicine), why should the mother have an obligation to carry it to term?

#201 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · CriticismCriticized3 criticim(s)

Superseded by #199. This comment was generated automatically.

#200 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

According to WebMD:

Most babies will start walking between about 10 and 18 months old, although some babies may walk as early as 9 months old.

And they retain that ability. So something must be being stored here.

They also start saying basic words by age 1, which they retain as well.

#199 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · revision of #168 · Criticism

Shouldn’t the father have some say? He shouldn’t get to dictate what she does with the baby, but shouldn’t he have some say? It’s his child, too, after all.

#178 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

Abortion is a moral right—which should be left to the sole discretion of the woman involved; morally, nothing other than her wish in the matter is to be considered. Who can conceivably have the right to dictate to her what disposition she is to make of the functions of her own body?

Rand, Ayn. The Voice of Reason: Essays in Objectivist Thought (The Ayn Rand Library) (pp. 58-59). Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
#177 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · revision of #176 · Criticized1 criticim(s)

Abortion is a moral right—which should be left to the sole discretion of the woman involved; morally, nothing other than her wish in the matter is to be considered. Who can conceivably have the right to dictate to her what disposition she is to make of the functions of her own body?

Rand, Ayn. The Voice of Reason: Essays in Objectivist Thought (The Ayn Rand Library) (pp. 58-59). Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.

Shouldn’t the father have some say? He shouldn’t get to dictate what she does with the baby, but shouldn’t he have some say? It’s his child, too, after all.

#176 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

It’s true that potential beings cannot have rights. But once a fetus is a person, it’s not a potential being anymore. It’s then an actual being.

It’s not the birth that turns a fetus into a person – it’s the running of the universal-explainer software I mentioned in #119. And that might occur before birth.

#175 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticism

Ayn Rand writes:

An embryo has no rights. Rights do not pertain to a potential, only to an actual being. A child cannot acquire any rights until it is born. The living take precedence over the not yet living (or the unborn).

Rand, Ayn. The Voice of Reason: Essays in Objectivist Thought (The Ayn Rand Library) (p. 58). Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
#174 · Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago · Criticized1 criticim(s)