543 ideas match your query.:
Search ideas
See #449. Since this is a separate concern, not directly related to #337, you’d want to submit a top-level idea rather than comment on #337. The form for top-level ideas is currently at the bottom of this page. I obviously need to make this clearer.
The more ideas there are in a discussion, the further the form for top-level ideas is pushed down. Then people don’t know how to submit a new idea and comment on an existing one instead, even if it’s unrelated, as happened with #448. So I need to make this clearer.
Now that there are notifications, people should be able to @mention each other.
The more ideas there are in a discussion, the further the form for top-level ideas is pushed down. Then people don’t know how to submit a new idea and comment on an existing one instead, even if it’s unrelated, as happened with #448. So I need to make this clearer.
See #449. Since this is a separate concern, not directly related to #337, you’d want to submit a top-level idea rather than comment on #337. The form for top-level ideas is currently at the bottom of this page. I obviously need to make this clearer.
Tom Nassis asks (#448):
I wanted to ask about how many members are here.
Currently 7.
And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.
Yes.
Hi all! This platform looks like such an awesome idea!
This discussion says, "Discuss Veritula itself. For feedback and suggestions."
I wanted to ask about how many members are here. And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.
Hi all! This platform looks like an awesome idea!
This discussion says, "Discuss Veritula itself. For feedback and suggestions."
I wanted to ask about how many members are here. And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.
As I write in the first link, the videos “mostly show bugs and nonsensical behavior, things that wouldn’t happen if animals were sentient.”
Superseded by #444. This comment was generated automatically.
The following commits should address this:
3af3966
Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originated idea)The HTML title now says ‘Idea x revised by…’
6c70cea
Underneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submitted it)It says ‘Dennis Hackethal, 1 day ago’ for new ideas, ‘Dennis Hackethal revised 1 day ago’ for revisions
d20d386
Explain that users can revise each others’ ideasAs part of the alert on the revision page, when the user is about to revise someone else’s idea.
c5748e3
Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’s ideaUnderneath each idea.
e0fbd41
List user under each revision in version historySo that each version is clearly attributed to the corresponding user.
06d3241
List contributors at top of version historyComma-separated list to see all contributors at a glance. Eg see here
Superseded by #442. This comment was generated automatically.
The following commits should address this:
3af3966
Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originated idea)The HTML title now says ‘Idea x revised by…’
6c70cea
Underneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submitted it)It says ‘Dennis Hackethal, 1 day ago’ for new ideas, ‘Dennis Hackethal revised 1 day ago’ for revisions
d20d386
Explain that users can revise each others’ ideasAs part of the alert on the revision page, when the user is about to revise someone else’s idea.
c5748e3
Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’s ideaUnderneath each idea.
e0fbd41
List user under each revision in version historySo that each version is clearly attributed to the corresponding user.
06d3241
List contributors at top of version historyComma-separated list to see all contributors at a glance
Superseded by #440. This comment was generated automatically.
The following commits should address this:
3af3966
Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originated idea)The HTML title now says ‘Idea x revised by…’
6c70cea
Underneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submitted it)It says ‘Dennis Hackethal, 1 day ago’ for new ideas, ‘Dennis Hackethal revised 1 day ago’ for revisions
d20d386
Explain that users can revise each others’ ideasAs part of the alert on the revision page, when the user is about to revise someone else’s idea.
c5748e3
Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’s ideaUnderneath each idea.
e0fbd41
List user under each revision in version historySo that each version is clearly attributed to the corresponding user.
The following commits should address this:
3af3966
Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originated idea)6c70cea
Underneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submitted it)d20d386
Explain that users can revise each others’ ideasc5748e3
Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’s ideae0fbd41
List user under each revision in version history
Superseded by #437. This comment was generated automatically.
Dirk Meulenbelt says the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.
Dirk Meulenbelt the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.
There’s a bug where right-clicking in a form to paste text doesn’t result in the preview updating.
Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werden muß.
Kant sagt also, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.
Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werden muß.
Kant sagt also, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.
Kant sagt, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss:
Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werden muß.
Kant sagt, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.