Activity feed
#452 · Dennis HackethalOP, 8 months agoNow that there are notifications, people should be able to @mention each other.
Mostly done, apart from some polishing, as of 5f5c545.
Link to discussion for clarity
See #449. Since this is a separate concern, not directly related to #337, you’d want to submit a top-level idea rather than comment on #337. The form for top-level ideas is currently at the bottom ofthis page.[this page](/discussions/167). I obviously need to make this clearer.
Now that there are notifications, people should be able to @mention each other.
The more ideas there are in a discussion, the further the form for top-level ideas is pushed down. Then people don’t know how to submit a new idea and comment on an existing one instead, even if it’s unrelated, as happened with #448. So I need to make this clearer.
#448 · Tom Nassis, 8 months agoHi all! This platform looks like such an awesome idea!
This discussion says, "Discuss Veritula itself. For feedback and suggestions."
I wanted to ask about how many members are here. And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.
Tom Nassis asks (#448):
I wanted to ask about how many members are here.
Currently 7.
And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.
Yes.
Hi all! This platform looks like such an awesome idea! This discussion says, "Discuss Veritula itself. For feedback and suggestions." I wanted to ask about how many members are here. And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.
#337 · Dennis HackethalOP, 9 months agoWhen all I change during a revision is the criticism flag, the activity log just says ‘no changes’.
Hi all! This platform looks like an awesome idea!
This discussion says, "Discuss Veritula itself. For feedback and suggestions."
I wanted to ask about how many members are here. And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.
As I write in the first link, the videos “mostly show bugs and nonsensical behavior, things that wouldn’t happen ifanimals *were* sentient.”↵ ↵ P.S. Dirk was hereanimals *were* sentient.”
Add example link to a version history with multiple contributors
24 unchanged lines collapsedComma-separated list to see all contributors at aglanceglance. Eg see [here](/ideas/429/revisions)
Add commit 06d3241
20 unchanged lines collapsedSo that each version is clearly attributed to the correspondinguser.user.↵ ↵ - `06d3241` List contributors at top of version history↵ ↵ Comma-separated list to see all contributors at a glance
Elaborate on each commit
The following commits should address this: - `3af3966` Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originatedidea)↵ -idea)↵ ↵ The HTML title now says ‘Idea x *revised* by…’↵ ↵ - `6c70cea` Underneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submittedit)↵ -it)↵ ↵ It says ‘Dennis Hackethal, 1 day ago’ for new ideas, ‘Dennis Hackethal revised 1 day ago’ for revisions↵ ↵ - `d20d386` Explain that users can revise each others’ideas↵ -ideas↵ ↵ As part of the alert on the revision page, when the user is about to revise someone else’s idea.↵ ↵ - `c5748e3` Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’sidea↵ -idea↵ ↵ Underneath each idea.↵ ↵ - `e0fbd41` List user under each revision in versionhistoryhistory↵ ↵ So that each version is clearly attributed to the corresponding user.
#437 · Dennis HackethalOP, 8 months agoDirk Meulenbelt says the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.
The following commits should address this:
3af3966Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originated idea)6c70ceaUnderneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submitted it)d20d386Explain that users can revise each others’ ideasc5748e3Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’s ideae0fbd41List user under each revision in version history
Add missing word
[Dirk Meulenbelt](/dirk-meulenbelt) says the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.
Dirk Meulenbelt the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.
#434 · Dennis HackethalOP, 8 months agoThere’s a bug where right-clicking in a form to paste text doesn’t result in the preview updating.
Fixed as of b5d435e.
There’s a bug where right-clicking in a form to paste text doesn’t result in the preview updating.
> Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werdenmuß.↵ Kantmuß.↵ ↵ Kant sagt also, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.
Kant sagt, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss:↵ ↵ >> Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werdenmuß.muß.↵ Kant sagt also, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.
Zitatangabe
Kant sagt, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werdenmuss.muss:↵ ↵ > Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werden muß.
Wir wollen Kants Text ‘Über Pädagogik’ verstehen und diskutieren: https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/book/view/kant_paedagogik_1803?p=7
Kant sagt, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.
As I write in the first link, the videos “mostly show bugs and nonsensical behavior, things that wouldn’t happen ifanimals *were* sentient.”animals *were* sentient.”↵ ↵ P.S. Dirk was here
#411 · Dennis Hackethal, 8 months agoI also don't mind the bulk criticism.
Even if the person submitting a post doesn’t mind bulk criticism, others still have a harder time discerning which ideas in the post are true/salvageable and which should be discarded. Meaning error correction is harder.
It helps when critics quote the part they’re criticizing, like I’m doing above, but the responsibility still lies with the original poster.
Criticism accepted
Link to revision activity with collapsed lines
Done as of `cc8e3e9`. It now says ‘x unchanged lines collapsed’. See eg [this activity](/activities/415).