Activity feed

  Dennis Hackethal criticized idea #299.

I’m pro abortion but I have some pro life in me.

Banning the abortion of a zygote seems ridiculous. So does aborting a seven-month-old fetus.

Why not go with: you can abort until the nervous system develops.

Clearly, an embryo without a nervous system can’t be sentient and thus can’t be a person, right? And as long as it’s not a person, it doesn’t have any rights.

According to https://www.neurosciencefoundation.org/post/brain-development-in-fetus, “an embryo’s brain and nervous system begin to develop at around the 6-week mark.” And: “At as early as 8 weeks (about 2 months), you can see physical evidence of the brain working (the electric impulses) as ultrasounds show the embryo moving.”

This idea is for viable pregnancies only. Other considerations may apply for non-viable ones.

#299·Dennis HackethalOP, about 1 year ago

Heather, who’s publicly shared that she’s had an abortion, says people treat a zygote as a clump of cells only when they don’t want it. When they want it, then they consider it a baby. They can’t have it both ways.

  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #455.

Link to example mention

Mostly done, apart from some polishing, as of `5f5c545`. Eg @dennis-hackethal.
  Dennis Hackethal addressed criticism #452.

Now that there are notifications, people should be able to @mention each other.

#452·Dennis HackethalOP, about 1 year ago

Mostly done, apart from some polishing, as of 5f5c545.

  Dennis Hackethal revised idea #450.

Link to discussion for clarity

See #449. Since this is a separate concern, not directly related to #337, you’d want to submit a top-level idea rather than comment on #337. The form for top-level ideas is currently at the bottom of this page.[this page](/discussions/167). I obviously need to make this clearer.
  Dennis Hackethal revised idea #451 and marked it as a criticism.
  Dennis Hackethal submitted criticism #452.
Now that there are notifications, people should be able to @mention each other.


  Dennis Hackethal submitted idea #451.
The more ideas there are in a discussion, the further the form for top-level ideas is pushed down. Then people don’t know how to submit a new idea and comment on an existing one instead, even if it’s unrelated, as happened with #448. So I need to make this clearer.


  Dennis Hackethal commented on idea #448.
Hi all!  This platform looks like such an awesome idea!

This discussion says, "Discuss Veritula itself. For feedback and suggestions."

I wanted to ask about how many members are here.  And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.


#448·Tom Nassis, about 1 year ago
See #449. Since this is a separate concern, not directly related to #337, you’d want to submit a top-level idea rather than comment on #337. The form for top-level ideas is currently at the bottom of this page. I obviously need to make this clearer.


  Dennis Hackethal submitted idea #449.
Tom Nassis asks (#448):


I wanted to ask about how many members are here.




Currently 7.


And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.




Yes.


  Tom Nassis revised idea #447.
Hi all!  This platform looks like such an awesome idea!
This discussion says, "Discuss Veritula itself. For feedback and suggestions."
I wanted to ask about how many members are here.  And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.
  Tom Nassis commented on criticism #337.
When all I change during a revision is the criticism flag, the activity log just says ‘no changes’.


#337·Dennis HackethalOP, about 1 year ago
Hi all!  This platform looks like an awesome idea!

This discussion says, "Discuss Veritula itself. For feedback and suggestions."

I wanted to ask about how many members are here.  And whether it's encouraged to invite more people, in order to add more and more conversations.


  Dennis Hackethal revised idea #429.
As I write in the first link, the videos “mostly show bugs and nonsensical behavior, things that wouldn’t happen if animals *were* sentient.”↵
↵
P.S. Dirk was hereanimals *were* sentient.”
  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #442.
Add example link to a version history with multiple contributors
 24 unchanged lines collapsed
    Comma-separated list to see all contributors at a glanceglance. Eg see [here](/ideas/429/revisions)
  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #440.
Add commit 06d3241
 20 unchanged lines collapsed
    So that each version is clearly attributed to the corresponding user.user.↵
↵
- `06d3241` List contributors at top of version history↵
↵
    Comma-separated list to see all contributors at a glance
  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #439.
Elaborate on each commit
The following commits should address this:

- `3af3966` Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originated idea)↵
-idea)↵
↵
    The HTML title now says ‘Idea x *revised* by…’↵
↵
- `6c70cea` Underneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submitted it)↵
-it)↵
↵
    It says ‘Dennis Hackethal, 1 day ago’ for new ideas, ‘Dennis Hackethal revised 1 day ago’ for revisions↵
↵
- `d20d386` Explain that users can revise each others’ ideas↵
-ideas↵
↵
    As part of the alert on the revision page, when the user is about to revise someone else’s idea.↵
↵
- `c5748e3` Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’s idea↵
-idea↵
↵
    Underneath each idea.↵
↵
- `e0fbd41` List user under each revision in version historyhistory↵
↵
    So that each version is clearly attributed to the corresponding user.
  Dennis Hackethal addressed criticism #437.
Dirk Meulenbelt says the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.


#437·Dennis HackethalOP, about 1 year ago
The following commits should address this:



    

  • 3af3966 Clarify in title that someone revised an idea (rathen than originated idea)
    • 

  • 6c70cea Underneath idea, indicate that someone revised an idea (rather than submitted it)
    • 

  • d20d386 Explain that users can revise each others’ ideas
    • 

  • c5748e3 Turn ‘revise’ link into ‘revise their idea’ when it’s someone else’s idea
    • 

  • e0fbd41 List user under each revision in version history
    • 



  Dennis Hackethal revised criticism #436.
Add missing word
[Dirk Meulenbelt](/dirk-meulenbelt) says the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.
  Dennis Hackethal submitted criticism #436.
Dirk Meulenbelt the concept of revising someone else’s idea is not intuitive.


  Dennis Hackethal addressed criticism #434.
There’s a bug where right-clicking in a form to paste text doesn’t result in the preview updating.


#434·Dennis HackethalOP, about 1 year ago
Fixed as of b5d435e.


  Dennis Hackethal submitted criticism #434.
There’s a bug where right-clicking in a form to paste text doesn’t result in the preview updating.


  Roswitha Kant revised idea #432.
> Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werden muß.↵
Kantmuß.↵
↵
Kant sagt also, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.
  Roswitha Kant revised idea #431.
Kant sagt, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss:↵
↵
>> Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werden muß.muß.↵
Kant sagt also, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.
  Roswitha Kant revised idea #430.
Zitatangabe
Kant sagt, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.muss:↵
↵
> Der Mensch ist das einzige Geschöpf, das erzogen werden muß.
  Roswitha Kant started a discussion titled Kants Pädagogik.
Wir wollen Kants Text ‘Über Pädagogik’ verstehen und diskutieren: https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/book/view/kant_paedagogik_1803?p=7


 The discussion starts with idea #430.
Kant sagt, dass der Mensch im Unterschied zum Tier erzogen werden muss.


  Dirk Meulenbelt revised idea #401.
As I write in the first link, the videos “mostly show bugs and nonsensical behavior, things that wouldn’t happen if animals *were* sentient.”animals *were* sentient.”↵
↵
P.S. Dirk was here