Dennis Hackethal
@dennis-hackethal·Member since June 2024
Activity
#2701·Dennis HackethalOP revised about 2 months agoOld ideas can pollute discussions. Like in this meta thread.
Proposed solution: ideas could be archived automatically if they haven’t been revised or criticized in 90 days, say.
Proposed solution: ideas with pending criticisms could be archived automatically if they haven’t had any activity in the past 30 days, say.
#2630·Dennis HackethalOP revised about 2 months agoDiscussions are getting slower to render as they grow. It’s a rendering issue (not a db issue).
I started a discussion earlier, and what I wrote in the “about” section of the discussion was not written well. I would like to revise it. Is this possible? If not, is there an intention to make this possible eventually?
I started a discussion earlier, and what I wrote in the “about” section of the discussion was not written well. I would like to revise it. Is this possible? If not, is there an intention to make this possible eventually?
Feature to collapse all criticized ideas of a discussion? Useful for todo lists.
Feature to collapse all criticized ideas of a discussion? Useful for todo lists.
#1760·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months agoAll emails have unsubscribe links, but people shouldn’t be able to unsubscribe from system emails like password resets.
This is not applicable anymore.
Need email notifications.
Need email notifications.
#456·Dennis HackethalOP revised over 1 year agoMostly done, apart from some polishing, as of
5f5c545. Eg @dennis-hackethal.
If it’s mostly done, what’s missing?
#426·Dennis HackethalOP revised over 1 year agoDone as of
cc8e3e9. It now says ‘x unchanged lines collapsed’. See eg this activity.
Now that diffs are formatted, they don’t omit unchanged lines anymore.
#2701·Dennis HackethalOP revised about 2 months agoOld ideas can pollute discussions. Like in this meta thread.
Proposed solution: allow people to archive ideas. Maybe only their own.
#2708·Dennis HackethalOP, about 2 months agoThere could be periodic reminders and a review board to make it easier.
That could just annoy people and cause them to unsubscribe from emails.
#2706·Dennis HackethalOP, about 2 months agoThis could inadvertently hide dormant but important ideas.
Could do it only for ideas with pending criticisms. If they have pending criticisms, how important can they be? This has the added benefit of creating an incentive for proponents of ideas to address criticisms.
There could be periodic reminders and a review board to make it easier.
#2703·Dennis HackethalOP, about 2 months agoProposed solution: edit a discussion to hide top-level ideas. That way, discussion owners can hide ideas they no longer deem relevant.
For example, completed tasks in discussions used as issue trackers, like this Meta thread, could be hidden so they don’t pollute the thread.
There could be a button for users to reveal hidden ideas so nothing is lost or hidden dishonestly. And direct links to hidden ideas would continue to work.
People might just forget to do this.
#2704·Dennis HackethalOP, about 2 months agoProposed solution: ideas could be archived automatically if they haven’t been revised or criticized in 90 days, say.
This could inadvertently hide dormant but important ideas.
#2703·Dennis HackethalOP, about 2 months agoProposed solution: edit a discussion to hide top-level ideas. That way, discussion owners can hide ideas they no longer deem relevant.
For example, completed tasks in discussions used as issue trackers, like this Meta thread, could be hidden so they don’t pollute the thread.
There could be a button for users to reveal hidden ideas so nothing is lost or hidden dishonestly. And direct links to hidden ideas would continue to work.
This requires manual action. Could mean a lot of work depending on the discussion.
#2701·Dennis HackethalOP revised about 2 months agoOld ideas can pollute discussions. Like in this meta thread.
Proposed solution: ideas could be archived automatically if they haven’t been revised or criticized in 90 days, say.
#2701·Dennis HackethalOP revised about 2 months agoOld ideas can pollute discussions. Like in this meta thread.
Proposed solution: edit a discussion to hide top-level ideas. That way, discussion owners can hide ideas they no longer deem relevant.
For example, completed tasks in discussions used as issue trackers, like this Meta thread, could be hidden so they don’t pollute the thread.
There could be a button for users to reveal hidden ideas so nothing is lost or hidden dishonestly. And direct links to hidden ideas would continue to work.
Feature idea: edit a discussion to hide top-level ideas. That way, discussion owners can hide ideas they no longer deem relevant.
For example, completed tasks in discussions used as issue trackers, like this Meta thread, could be hidden so they don’t pollute the thread.
There could be a button for users to reveal hidden ideas so nothing is lost or hidden dishonestly. And direct links to hidden ideas would continue to work.
Old ideas can pollute discussions. Like in this meta thread.
I can still reproduce the issue by clicking on the button to collapse/expand an idea.
Feature idea: edit a discussion to hide ideas. That way, discussion owners can hide ideas they no longer deem relevant. (For example, completed tasks in discussions used as issue trackers, like this Meta thread.) There could be a button for users to reveal hidden ideas so nothing is lost of hidden dishonestly.
Feature idea: edit a discussion to hide top-level ideas. That way, discussion owners can hide ideas they no longer deem relevant.
For example, completed tasks in discussions used as issue trackers, like this Meta thread, could be hidden so they don’t pollute the thread.
There could be a button for users to reveal hidden ideas so nothing is lost or hidden dishonestly. And direct links to hidden ideas would continue to work.
Feature idea: edit a discussion to hide ideas. That way, discussion owners can hide ideas they no longer deem relevant. (For example, completed tasks in discussions used as issue trackers, like this Meta thread.) There could be a button for users to reveal hidden ideas so nothing is lost of hidden dishonestly.
This problem will surface rarely – users would have to hit cmd + f immediately upon opening the page. For most users, by the time they start typing, the page is already fully loaded. So this seems like a small price to pay in exchange for discussion pages that always render faster.