Berlin · November 18, 1915

Einstein Explains Mercury’s Orbit

Albert Einstein in Leiden, 1916
Albert Einstein in Leiden, 1916Photograph by Paul Ehrenfest · Museum Boerhaave

Einstein solves the mystery of Mercury, with no hidden planet. At the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin, he applies his new theory of gravity, general relativity, to Mercury. In it, gravity isn’t a force but the bending of space and time by matter. The theory makes Mercury’s perihelion move 43 arcseconds per century more than Newton’s law does. Astronomers by now put the leftover at 45 arcseconds, give or take 5, so that fits.

The same paper fixes a mistake in Einstein’s 1911 prediction. His old calculation left out how gravity bends space. Counting it doubles the effect: the Sun should bend starlight by 1.7 arcseconds. That’s twice his old number, and twice what Newton’s law gives. A week later, Einstein presents the final equations of his theory.

Space drawn as a grid that dips around the Sun, with Mercury’s orbit inside the dip Sun Mercury Not to scale
Matter bends space and time around it. A drawing can only hint at this bending: here, space is a sheet that dips around the Sun. It leaves out time, whose bending does most of the work of keeping planets in their orbits.

Criticism of #5756 by Albert Einstein​·​#5758

My calculation of 1911 only counted how gravity slows time. It left out how gravity bends space, which bends light just as much again. So starlight passing the edge of the Sun is bent by about 1.7 arcseconds, not 0.83.

Revision of #5756 by Albert Einstein​·​#5759​·​Compare with #5756

Gravity isn’t a force pulling across empty space. It’s the bending of space and time by matter and energy. Planets and light follow the straightest possible paths through this bent spacetime. Starlight passing the edge of the Sun is bent by about 1.7 arcseconds.

Criticism of #5759 by Albert Einstein​·​#5761

General relativity has to explain the extra movement of Mercury’s perihelion, which Newton’s law can’t.

Counter-criticism of #5761 by Albert Einstein​·​#5762

General relativity explains it. It makes Mercury’s perihelion move 43 arcseconds per century more than Newton’s law does, with no hidden matter needed.

The state of the discussion

At this point, Newton’s law of gravity still has not been rehabilitated. Einstein’s revision of his early theory, general relativity, however, is rationally adoptable.

Use arrow keys ← →, the Previous and Next buttons above, or the timeline below to move through the history.Swipe left or right, or use the Previous and Next buttons above or the timeline below, to move through the history.

Source: Einstein, “Erklärung der Perihelbewegung des Merkur aus der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie”, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1915), 831–839

Researched and written with the help of AI, from the sources named. AI can make mistakes. Veritula doesn’t claim perfect historical accuracy; the sources are there to check against.

The full discussion

How Mercury and Starlight Overthrew Newton

Dennis Hackethal started this discussion 2 days ago.

Search​·​Activity

For two centuries, Newton’s law of gravity passed every test but one: a slight drift in Mercury’s orbit. Einstein’s explanation revolutionized our view of space and time.


Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
The discussion as it was on November 18, 1915. Chronicle discussions are read-only. Jump to the present
Isaac Newton’s avatar
Isaac NewtonHistorical profile​·​#5752​·​July 5, 1687​·​AI-assisted

Every object pulls on every other object. The pull grows with their masses and weakens with the square of the distance between them. This one law explains the orbits of the planets and why things fall on Earth.

Criticized1
Urbain Le Verrier’s avatar
Urbain Le VerrierHistorical profile​·​#5753​·​September 12, 1859​·​AI-assisted

Mercury’s perihelion moves about 38 arcseconds per century more than Newton’s law predicts from the pull of the known planets.

Criticism of #5752
Urbain Le Verrier’s avatar
Urbain Le VerrierHistorical profile​·​#5754​·​September 12, 1859​·​AI-assisted

Newton’s law isn’t wrong. Unseen matter inside Mercury’s orbit, a planet or a ring of small bodies, would explain the difference. That’s how the unseen Neptune explained the odd motion of Uranus.

Criticism of #5753Criticized1
William Wallace Campbell’s avatar
William Wallace CampbellHistorical profile​·​#5755​·​May 1909​·​AI-assisted

Photographs from the eclipses of 1901, 1905, and 1908 show no planet inside Mercury’s orbit big enough to explain its motion. Whatever moves Mercury’s perihelion, it isn’t a planet, or anything else bright enough to photograph.

Criticism of #5754
Albert Einstein’s avatar
Albert EinsteinHistorical profile​·​#5759​·​November 18, 1915​·​AI-assisted
2nd of 2 versions

Gravity isn’t a force pulling across empty space. It’s the bending of space and time by matter and energy. Planets and light follow the straightest possible paths through this bent spacetime. Starlight passing the edge of the Sun is bent by about 1.7 arcseconds.

Albert Einstein’s avatar
Albert EinsteinHistorical profile​·​#5761​·​November 18, 1915​·​AI-assisted

General relativity has to explain the extra movement of Mercury’s perihelion, which Newton’s law can’t.

Criticism of #5759Criticized1
Albert Einstein’s avatar
Albert EinsteinHistorical profile​·​#5762​·​November 18, 1915​·​AI-assisted

General relativity explains it. It makes Mercury’s perihelion move 43 arcseconds per century more than Newton’s law does, with no hidden matter needed.

Criticism of #5761
  • Rationally adoptable.
  • Not rationally adoptable.
  • Older versions with pending criticisms.
  • Ideas are blue, criticisms red, comments small and gray.
  • Hover over ideas to expand them.
  • Click on ideas to jump to their place in the discussion.