Garching, Germany · April 2020

A Star’s Orbit around a Black Hole Turns

The center of the Milky Way, around Sagittarius A*
The center of the Milky Way, around Sagittarius A*NASA, ESA, STScI, CXC, SSC

Einstein passes a test 27,000 light-years away. At the center of our galaxy, the Milky Way, sits a huge black hole called Sagittarius A*. A star named S2 orbits it every 16 years. Astronomers have followed S2 for 27 years, lately with the GRAVITY instrument on the Very Large Telescope in Chile. The GRAVITY collaboration, an international team of astronomers, reports that its orbit turns a little each time around, by about 12 arcminutes. An arcminute is 60 arcseconds. That’s just what general relativity predicts. Under Newton’s law, a lone star orbiting a lone mass would follow the same oval forever.

The star S2 traveling its orbit around the black hole Sagittarius A* while the orbit turns a little with each revolution, so that its pericenter, the point closest to the black hole, advances Sagittarius A* Actual Pericenter Predicted Not to scale
Drag the slider to move through time. S2 orbits the black hole every 16 years. General relativity predicts that its orbit turns by about 12 arcminutes each time around, much like Mercury’s, only far faster. GRAVITY has observed this turning. The dashed orbit and hollow dot show where Newton’s law puts S2: on the same orbit forever.

Criticism of #5752 by GRAVITY Collaboration​·​#5767

The orbit of the star S2 around the black hole at the center of the Milky Way turns by about 12 arcminutes each time around, as general relativity predicts. Newton’s law predicts no such turning for a single star orbiting a single mass.

The state of the discussion

Newton’s law of gravity now has three pending criticisms, so it still isn’t rationally adoptable. General relativity, though it has passed the S2 test, continues to have one pending criticism, so it isn’t rationally adoptable as a description of reality either.

Use arrow keys ← →, the Previous and Next buttons above, or the timeline below to move through the history.Swipe left or right, or use the Previous and Next buttons above or the timeline below, to move through the history.

Source: GRAVITY Collaboration, “Detection of the Schwarzschild precession in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole”, Astronomy & Astrophysics 636 (2020), L5

Researched and written with the help of AI, from the sources named. AI can make mistakes. Veritula doesn’t claim perfect historical accuracy; the sources are there to check against.

The full discussion

How Mercury and Starlight Overthrew Newton

Dennis Hackethal started this discussion 2 days ago.

Search​·​Activity

For two centuries, Newton’s law of gravity passed every test but one: a slight drift in Mercury’s orbit. Einstein’s explanation revolutionized our view of space and time.


Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
The discussion as it was in April 2020. Chronicle discussions are read-only. Jump to the present
Isaac Newton’s avatar
Isaac NewtonHistorical profile​·​#5752​·​July 5, 1687​·​AI-assisted

Every object pulls on every other object. The pull grows with their masses and weakens with the square of the distance between them. This one law explains the orbits of the planets and why things fall on Earth.

Criticized3
Urbain Le Verrier’s avatar
Urbain Le VerrierHistorical profile​·​#5753​·​September 12, 1859​·​AI-assisted

Mercury’s perihelion moves about 38 arcseconds per century more than Newton’s law predicts from the pull of the known planets.

Criticism of #5752
Urbain Le Verrier’s avatar
Urbain Le VerrierHistorical profile​·​#5754​·​September 12, 1859​·​AI-assisted

Newton’s law isn’t wrong. Unseen matter inside Mercury’s orbit, a planet or a ring of small bodies, would explain the difference. That’s how the unseen Neptune explained the odd motion of Uranus.

Criticism of #5753Criticized1
William Wallace Campbell’s avatar
William Wallace CampbellHistorical profile​·​#5755​·​May 1909​·​AI-assisted

Photographs from the eclipses of 1901, 1905, and 1908 show no planet inside Mercury’s orbit big enough to explain its motion. Whatever moves Mercury’s perihelion, it isn’t a planet, or anything else bright enough to photograph.

Criticism of #5754
Arthur Stanley Eddington’s avatar
Arthur Stanley EddingtonHistorical profile​·​#5764​·​November 6, 1919​·​AI-assisted

Starlight passing the Sun is bent about twice as much as Newton’s law allows.

Criticism of #5752
GRAVITY Collaboration’s avatar
GRAVITY CollaborationHistorical profile​·​#5767​·​April 2020​·​AI-assisted

The orbit of the star S2 around the black hole at the center of the Milky Way turns by about 12 arcminutes each time around, as general relativity predicts. Newton’s law predicts no such turning for a single star orbiting a single mass.

Criticism of #5752
Albert Einstein’s avatar
Albert EinsteinHistorical profile​·​#5759​·​November 18, 1915​·​AI-assisted
2nd of 2 versions

Gravity isn’t a force pulling across empty space. It’s the bending of space and time by matter and energy. Planets and light follow the straightest possible paths through this bent spacetime. Starlight passing the edge of the Sun is bent by about 1.7 arcseconds.

Criticized1
Matvei Bronstein’s avatar
Matvei BronsteinHistorical profile​·​#5766​·​1936​·​AI-assisted

General relativity can’t be the whole truth about gravity. Together with quantum theory, it implies that gravity can’t be measured precisely in tiny regions of space. So the smooth spacetime of general relativity must break down there.

Criticism of #5759
Albert Einstein’s avatar
Albert EinsteinHistorical profile​·​#5761​·​November 18, 1915​·​AI-assisted

General relativity has to explain the extra movement of Mercury’s perihelion, which Newton’s law can’t.

Criticism of #5759Criticized1
Albert Einstein’s avatar
Albert EinsteinHistorical profile​·​#5762​·​November 18, 1915​·​AI-assisted

General relativity explains it. It makes Mercury’s perihelion move 43 arcseconds per century more than Newton’s law does, with no hidden matter needed.

Criticism of #5761
Frank Watson Dyson’s avatar
Frank Watson DysonHistorical profile​·​#5763​·​March 1917​·​AI-assisted

Einstein’s prediction that the Sun bends starlight by 1.7 arcseconds hasn’t been tested yet. The eclipse of May 29, 1919, can test it, since the Sun will be among the many bright stars of the Hyades.

Criticism of #5759Criticized1
Frank Watson Dyson’s avatar
Frank Watson DysonHistorical profile​·​#5765​·​November 6, 1919​·​AI-assisted

The eclipse photos of 1919 show starlight bent by between about 1.6 and 2.0 arcseconds at the edge of the Sun, as general relativity predicts.

Criticism of #5763
  • Rationally adoptable.
  • Not rationally adoptable.
  • Older versions with pending criticisms.
  • Ideas are blue, criticisms red, comments small and gray.
  • Hover over ideas to expand them.
  • Click on ideas to jump to their place in the discussion.