What's wrong with probability?

Tyler Mills started this discussion 22 days ago.

Search​·​Activity

I'd like to clarify the status of probability-related thinking and everyday terms like "probably", "likely", "expectation", etc.

  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas, and submit new ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
Tyler Mills’s avatar

Events occur or don't, and conjectures are refuted or aren't. So is it irrational to say something will "probably happen?

Criticized1
Benjamin Davies’s avatar

(Steel-manning the common sense view)

We assign implicit probabilities as an expression of our current state of knowledge.

"In the summer desert it will probably be sunny this afternoon" tends to come from some who has no reason to think it won't be sunny, but maybe hasn't investigated it enough to be confident. It roughly translates to "everything I know points to it being sunny this afternoon, but I don't have a grasp of all the factors involved, so I am allowing myself the slim possibility (lol) that I will be surprised".

Criticism of #4759
👍Tyler Mills’s avatar
Tyler Mills’s avatar

In summer in the desert, will it "probably" be sunny in the afternoon?

Tyler Mills’s avatar

No, it will or it won't, but "probably" expresses one's awareness of a lack of battletested explanations, or of their own uncertainty or lack of confidence in the prediction, etc. (cf. #4764).

Tyler Mills’s avatar

I will probably not want to learn a new language in the next year.

Criticized1
Tyler Mills’s avatar

It is mistaken to apply probabilistic thinking to human affairs, because they involve knowledge, and the growth of knowledge cannot be predicted.

Criticism of #4761
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

In everyday English, we say ‘probably’ to leave room for error and communicate some uncertainty. That’s fine because everyone knows we’re not assigning actual probabilities in the sense of the probability calculus.

In math, we use the probability calculus to describe the frequency of outcomes for underlying processes that look random. Like a coin toss. That’s also fine because we know all possible outcomes and we have a measure for each.

Things go wrong when people use probability even though they don’t know the outcomes (because of the growth of knowledge, say, as you write in #4762) or they have no measure for them or the underlying phenomena don’t behave randomly (again because of the growth of knowledge). Like Elon Musk tweeting we’re 90% likely to see AGI in 2026. (Not a literal quote but he says stuff like that sometimes.)

Some people try to steal the prestige of math and hide their ignorance by using the probability calculus illegitimately.

See also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfzSE4Hoxbc. It’s been years since I watched it but it’s bound to have related ideas.

Tyler Mills’s avatar

I think this clarifies it, thanks. Used in common speech to express uncertainty and leave room for error, valid mathematically only when all outcomes are known and have a measure.