Choosing a place to live

Showing only #3187 and its comments.

See full discussion
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3187

A place to live: North Shore, Auckland, New Zealand

Criticized9
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3188

Auckland is at sea level, so the health benefits of being at altitude are not available here.

Criticism of #3187
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3189

Reduced sun exposure: Auckland experiences a lot of cloud cover and rainfall, particularly during the winter months. Summer months are quite good though. Auckland gets about 2,000 - 2,120 hours of sunshine per year according to Google.

Criticism of #3187
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3190

Auckland tap water is drinkable, but fluoride is added.

Criticism of #3187
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3191

If children are not sent to school, there is a lot of bureaucratic work that the parents need to go through. It requires an exemption application and the Ministry of Education retains the right to review the educational philosophy and curriculum.

Criticism of #3187
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3192

People are not fully free to do what they want with the land. The Resource Management Act (RMA) and local council unitary plans create extreme friction. Modifications to land, heritage overlays, and tree protection laws severely restrict the "Right to Build."

Criticism of #3187
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3193

Taxation: No comprehensive capital gains tax and no inheritance tax suggest a favorable environment. However, the Foreign Investment Fund (FIF) rules tax unrealized gains on foreign assets, and trust tax rates are high (39%), creating friction for global capital allocators.

Criticism of #3187
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3194

No right to self-defense: Self-defense laws rely on "reasonable force" proportionality which often favours the aggressor in court. Pepper spray is classified as a restricted weapon and is illegal for civilians to carry for self-defense.

Criticism of #3187
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3195

Freedom of expression is generally upheld by common law, but recent legislative trends and the Harmful Digital Communications Act introduce mechanisms for state censorship regarding "hate speech."

Criticism of #3187
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP, about 19 hours ago·#3196

Social Trust / Safety: Urban awareness required. While historically very safe, recent trends in property crime and "ram raids" indicate a degrading security environment. It is no longer a "doors unlocked" culture.

Criticism of #3187