Does Compulsory Schooling Serve to Liberate Children?
See full discussionLog in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.If freedom of choice is sufficiently restricted, freedom of thought is also restricted.
Anyone who is forced to spend hours every day dealing with topics they would otherwise not deal with has neither freedom of choice nor freedom of thought.
Forcing someone to think is impossible. The student remains free in his thoughts.
(Kant)
Expecting a child to keep his freedom of thought in the face of all that pressure is not realistic.
Although you can't force someone to think, you can create the conditions for them to force themselves to think.
That's exactly what school does.
Freedom of choice is not restricted at school. For example, students can choose between different languages. They can choose their exams and what to read, etc.
(Kant)
That's not a real choice. For example, I had to choose between French and Latin, but I didn't have the choice to do neither and create a new alternative.
Compulsory schooling itself violates freedom of choice, as the student does not have the choice to stay at home and do something else with his time instead.
Exams are not an example of freedom of choice. On the contrary: they are an instrument of oppression.