Veritula – Meta

Showing only those parts of the discussion that lead to #4107 and its comments.

See full discussion·See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
5th of 5 versions leading to #4107 (5 total)

Veritula should have some way to acknowledge an idea, including a way to show that a thread is resolved, at least for the time being, without having to comment.

Criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

How about emoji reactions?

Battle tested
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
2nd of 2 versions leading to #4107 (2 total)

The purpose of the reaction would be to record a kind of agreement or acknowledgment.

That way, Veritula could show unacknowledged criticisms to users. So in addition to revising or counter-criticizing, they get a chance to acknowledge a criticism without having to comment.

Posting arbitrary emojis doesn’t achieve that purpose.

Criticism of #2159Criticized1*
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
2nd of 2 versions

Doesn’t need to be arbitrary emojis, it could just be a handful that you choose, each being a different flavour of acknowledgement.

Thumbs up,
Thinking emoji,
Mind-blown emoji,
Etc.

Edit: X spaces are an example of a limited set of emojis working well.

Criticism of #4116Criticized2
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

I think the reason the limited set works well in X spaces is that there’s no text input. So there’s no way to sidestep the restriction.

For Veritula, it would be more like an emoji restriction on tweets. That wouldn’t work because you couldn’t stop people from posting arbitrary emojis in tweets by just typing them with their keyboards.

Criticism of #4107
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Edit: …

Pointing out changes is discouraged. Version history and diffing take care of that for you.

Criticism of #4107