Choosing a place to live

Showing only ideas leading to #5079 and its comments.

See full discussion·​See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP·​#3187·​

A place to live: North Shore, Auckland, New Zealand

Criticized8*
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin DaviesOP·​#3190·​·​Criticism

Auckland tap water is drinkable, but fluoride is added.

Criticized1*
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal·​#3403·​·​Criticism

What’s wrong with fluoride?

Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Tyler Mills’s avatar
Tyler Mills·​#5079·​·​Criticism

Gemini's response to that tweet: "The text uses legitimate biochemical concepts—like the fact that fluoride is a potent halogen that hardens minerals and can be toxic in high doses—to build a narrative based on skewed history. It fabricates a geological explanation for Hereford, Texas, to erase the very thing that actually protected the town's teeth: naturally occurring fluoride."

👍Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal·​#5080·​

I usually get conspiracy vibes from anti-fluoride sources, but I haven’t looked into it much.

  • Rationally adoptable.
  • Not rationally adoptable.
  • Older versions with pending criticisms.
  • Ideas are blue, criticisms red, comments small and gray.
  • Hover over ideas to expand them.
  • Click on ideas to jump to their place in the discussion.